Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> action necessary at this time would be to authorize staff to work with School <br /> District 4J to'determLnestandai:ds under which it would be willing to give its <br /> . approval. 'When agreement is reached, he said, then the program would come back <br /> to the Council for consideration of adoption. e <br /> John Porter, planning'director.,said these two bills were initiated by the city <br /> of Portland. They were meant ~o encourage the upgrading of 25~yearor older <br /> structures and the rebuilding of multiple~family housing in central city areas. <br /> The HCDC felt both were important tools to have available and proposed staff <br /> preparation ofguideliriesfor Counci.l consideration if concept of the programs <br /> was approved at this time.. <br /> Mr. Murray moved second by Mr ~ Williams to approve .in concept pro- <br /> visions of H.B.2342 and 2343 and ask preparation of guidelines to <br /> be brought back to the Council. >. <br /> Councilwoman Beal felt the programs would result in higher rents for occupants of <br /> both the older housing and multiple-family housing units. She noted the exemption <br /> would apply only to the value of improvements, saying that a tax exemption for a <br /> $5000 improvement on a $40,000 structure wouldn't amount to much. But the cost <br /> of the improvement itself would have to be charged back to tenants in the form <br /> of higher rents. Councilman Williams said the intent of the legislation was to <br /> do the opposite, that a requirement of the exemption would be to pass the saving <br /> through to the renter. Mr. Porter added that just one pait of the legislation <br /> probably wouldn't help much, but it was the idea that a series of programs Ivould. <br /> Costs involved in bringing older structures to code requirements usually are quite <br /> high and rsult in increased property taxes because the value of the property may <br /> be increased up to 50%. He recognized that the programs wouldn't solve all the <br /> problems, but it was intended to encourage the rehabilitation of the older type <br /> structures. -- <br /> Councilman Murray said the HCDC was really trying a "multidimension attack" <br /> on the problem of deteriorating housing and it needs as many .~ools as there may <br /> be available. He noted the frustration of lacking the ability to increase the <br /> amount of low-~ost housing and at the same time gaining nothing by letting exist- <br /> ing housing deteriorate. He felt the problem should be tackled in whatever ~ay <br /> I"CI:-; possi.ble an:! this J.egislatioT) p::ovidec7 one appr:oacn. <br /> Coun.cilman iJ2W3 a~k,.:Jd if D.gree/Ti"tr. t !vas needed only with SchooL District <lJ, or <br /> also with Bethel District 52. Councilman Williams had the impression that agree- <br /> ment would have to be reached with the school district in whichever area the pro- <br /> gram would be pursued. However, he said, the programs were slanted more toward <br /> housing rehabilitation in central city areas. Manager suggested that the motion <br /> include authorization for talks with both 4J and Bethel districts, and Councilman <br /> Murray with consent of Councilman Williams changed the motion to include that <br /> authorization. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion to approve concept of the programs as Comm <br /> presented and authorize staff to commence talks with School District 7/30/75 <br /> 4J and Bethel District 52 to gain their approval. Motion carried Approve <br /> unanimously. <br /> E. Official Greeters for City, a proposal submitted by a group formed within the Eugene <br /> Chamber of Commerce and now functioning as "greeters" for commercial interests in <br /> town and the University. . <br /> Don Turner, president of the Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce, introduced Jim Hartman, <br /> spokesman for the greeters group (White Coats Brigade), with the comment that it was <br /> a nonpartisan effort to promote the best interests of the city and Lane County area. <br /> 8/11/75 - 18 ~~$ <br />