Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> rather it was a question of what was best for the entire metropolitan area over a <br /> period of time. He noted the L&B study indicated more commercially zoned land would <br /> be needed, also that more retail space would be needed by 1990 and a third regional <br /> shopping center by 1980. He didn't think it would be to the best interests of the e <br /> metropolitan area to foreclose on Goodpasture Island at this time as a potential <br /> site for that center. He noted certain commercial uses classified as "other retail" <br /> which normally go into commercial strips and said they could go into the northern <br /> end Gf the Island, recognizing they would not be located downtown. He said the <br /> recommendation for residential use was not based on the need for residential uses, <br /> rather it was based on the fear of further commercial development and its effect on <br /> the downtown. He felt there were sufficient areas close to downtown that were suit- <br /> able for residential development without taking the Island for that purpose. <br /> Mr. Moulton continued that he thought the Plan should be amended to permit both resi- <br /> dential and commercial use at the north end of the Island, and that portion along the <br /> River designated for residential use. He thought the northern portion of the Island <br /> would lend itself admirably to the location ofathird regional center, that there were <br /> many alternatives available to control timing of that development. He said that the <br /> present Eugene policy might not be the best for the total metropolitan area, that it <br /> might not make the best use of present capital improvements, the present road system, <br /> and the present mass transit system. Without doubt, he said, more traffic would occur <br /> if a third regional center was located at the eastern edge of the metropolitan area <br /> than if it was located in the center of the bulk of the population. Mr. Moulton <br /> felt planning and zoning provisions should be provided to meet both commercial and <br /> residential needs in a way that would permit building now, thereby providing help in <br /> the unemployment situation. He urged rejection of the proposed amendment to allow <br /> medium-density residential and adoption instead of an amendment that would permit de- <br /> velopment of some residential on the northern end of the Island and in those areas <br /> that would take advantage of the amenities of the River, thereby supplying both e <br /> commercial and residential needs through timing of development for protection of the <br /> downtown area. <br /> II -A-5 <br /> Ellis Jones, 1030 Coburg Road, submitted an overview of actions leading to the L&B <br /> commercial study, saying a contract was entered into without bids and without participa- <br /> tion by other governmental agencies in the area. He said Goodpasture Island was <br /> designated as an opportunity area because of the scarcity in other parts of the metro- <br /> politan area of unbroken parcels of land suitable for institutional or regional activi- <br /> ties. That scarcity, he said, was even more critical now. He said originally Good- <br /> pasture Island was considered not suitable for residential use because of its separation <br /> from school facilities. Also, that the amount of land now zoned for residential use <br /> represented a 50-year inventory. Mr. Jones said the commercial study dealt only with <br /> retail and office space, and it st~ted that neither the downtown area nor Valley River , <br /> could handle what would be needed in that type of space, based on projected population <br /> figures. So eventually a third regional center would develop. And inventories had <br /> shown that in the metropolitan area there was very little land suitable for that type <br /> development. Further commercial developmerlt in the Goodpasture Island area, he said, <br /> would not hurt downtown Eugene. He said tHat making a "bedroom" area of the Island <br /> would result in development and jobs going elsewhere because restricting commercial <br /> development there would not stop the need for commercial uses. <br /> Duncan Wilson, general manager of Kendall Ford, felt that adoption of the proposed II-A-6 <br /> amendment would be a breach of faith. He said they had built on the Island on the <br /> premise that the area was designated an opportunity area and no residential development <br /> would occur. He thought the amendment would dorce annexation of the area to gain . <br /> sewer services for residential use, although his firm had been promised their prop- <br /> erty would not be annexed until all city services were available. He said they had <br /> gone ahead with their private sewer service installation with that understanding. <br /> Curtailing industrial growth, he said, was not in line with the understanding they <br /> had with the city and the county when Kendall Ford located on the Island. This pro- <br /> posed change, he 5~d, would seriously question the integrity of local govemment. <br /> 8/25/75 - 6 470 <br />