09/22/1975 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

neighborhood group the names of applicants not selected for a particular board. The neighborhood group could then contact that person for possible involvement at least at the neighborhood level. Mr. Henry felt that would be a basic change in the idea of the campaign. Mr. Murray thought that could be easily accommodated e if so desired. Expanding the data handling routine was the concern expressed by Mr. Williams. It would seem that, if an individual can find out where to submit an application, that individual can probably find out where the neighborhood group meets as well. Mr. Bradley suggested that it might be best to wait until after the November election to conduct the campaign. It was explained that waiting until November would run the campaign too close to the beginning of the next calendar year. October is even crowding the time frame a bit and a suggestion was made to delete the words, "at the close of the year" from Item No. B. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to adopt the concepts listed in Comm the Citizen Participation Proposal, with the insertion of "written" 9/10/75 before "application" in NO. 6 and the deletion of "at the close of Approve the year" in No. B. Mr. Williams further expressed his concern with creating a mass of paper work at one time. He tends to favor soliciting applications for a specific appointment when it comes up. In answer to a question, Mr. Murray said there was nothing in the document to insist on or preclude publishing notice of a vacancy during the middle of the year. In answer to a question from Mr. Bradley, Manager pointed out this proposal would technically require extensive changes in the bylaws, as they now contain some specifications and regulations for making appointments. Mr. Hamel wondered if the whole document is really even necessary~ There seems e to be so much "assuming" about how details will be handled. Particulars do not seem to be spelled out point blank. He is not against the idea, but he wonders if a formalized process is necessary if the same thing can be put into practice wi thOllt one. Wouldn't it be easier, he wondered, to advertise for a vacancy as it arises. Mr. Murray's opinion was that there is not presently an adequate system. He feels Council would be doing themselves and the community a favor by standardizing the procedures. Opportunities for public involvement would be made more accessible to the citizen. A well organized campaign expands potential horizons quite a bit, he thought. Vote was taken on the motion which carried, all Council members present voting aye except Mr. Williams and Mr. Hamel voting no. C.Park Bond Issue Report Status - A Planning Commission report has been rec~ived. The Housing and Community Development Commission is still considering this matter and will discuss it at their next meeting. A question arose regarding a public hearing by the Council. October 1] had been suggested, which would rule out having the matter on the November ballot. Ms. Shirey moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to schedule a public hearing Comm on the Park Bond Issue for October 13, 1975. Motion carried 9/17/75 unanimously. Approve _D. Liquor License - Change of OWnership - 7-11 Store - The 7-11 store at 2777 Friendly has requested a routine transfer of ownership to the new owner, David F. Fletcher. Staff finds everything in order. Comm Mr. Hamel moved seconded by Ms. Beal to recommend approval. 9/17/75 Motion carried unanimously. Approve SIb 9/22/75 - 5