Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> motion should be defeated. Councilmwoman Shirey wondered what the options were if <br /> the issue was merely postponed to the Wednesday committee session, and no other action <br /> taken at this time. That would give opportunity for contact with Springfield in <br />e light of the discussion at this meeting. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion defeated - Council <br /> members Keller, Williams, and Bradley voting aye; Council members <br /> Murray, Beal, Hamel, Haws, and Shirey voting no. <br /> Councilman Hamel asked if there was any way to instruct staff to make further investi- <br /> gation. Mr. Long said he would conclude that the prior action (in committee) stands. <br /> If an agreement limiting liability to $2000 was not forthcoming, then no agreement <br /> would be signed. <br /> Mrs. Shirey moved second by Mr. Bradley that staff review the situation <br /> in light of discussion at this meeting and bring back for further dis- <br /> cussion at the Wednesday committee meeting (October 29), and to ask <br /> Springfield staff to attend that meeting. <br /> Councilman Murray didn't understand the reason for the motion. He thought it would be <br /> asking staff to decide the direction Council wished to take. He understood the <br /> program was not in jeopardy, that someone would step in, and that Eugene to some ex- <br /> tent was still a partner in the project. Mr. Keller partially agreed. However, he <br /> thought if nothing was done, Eugene would not be a participant, and he thought <br /> Eugene citizens would like some response. He said the city had contracted for many, <br /> many times more money than the $2000 liability discussed, and that the only question <br /> seemed to be whether the program would lose money. He thought if Eugene citizens <br /> were going to see the exhibits, then the Council should do something. Mr. Murray <br /> replied that Eugene's not signing the contract would not necessarily mean there would <br />e be no exhibit. It was hid understanding that the project would go ahead anyway. <br /> Mrs. Beal saw no difference between this motion and the one just defeated. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion defeated - Council <br /> members Williams, Bradley, and Shirey voting aye; Council members <br /> Murray, Keller, Beal, Hamel, and Haws voting no. <br /> III - Items acted upon with one motion after discussion of individual items if requested. <br /> Previously discussed in committee on October 15 (Present: Mayor Anderson; Council <br /> members Murray, Beal, Williams, Bradley, Hamel, Haws, and Shirey) and October 22, <br /> 1975 (Present: Mayor Anderson; Council members Murray, Keller, Beal, Bradley, Hamel, <br /> Haws, and Shirey). Minutes of those meetings appear below in italics. <br /> A. Voting Eugene Dele~ates to NLC - November 30-December 4 -Mr. Bradley and <br /> Mayor Anderson are the only two going from Eugene. <br /> Corom <br /> Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that Mayor Anderson be 10/15/75 <br /> designated Eugene delegate and Mr. Bradley the alternate. Motion Approve <br /> carried unanimously. <br /> B. Approval of Acquisition of Bike Easement - 15th to Franklin - Patrick and <br /> Elizabeth McGarvey - $200.00 <br /> This project will involve building some fencing, etc. to protect the abutting <br /> property. <br />e Mrs. Bea1 moved seconded by Mr. Murray to approve the acquisition. <br /> Mr. Williams questioned whether 15th goes through to Franklin. Asst. Manager <br /> noted the bike path is a connector - a little jog going off of 16th. Corom <br /> 10/15/76 <br /> Vote was taken on the motion which carried unanimously. Approve <br /> .559 10/27/75 - 7 <br />