Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Murray agreed with Mrs. Shirey's opposition to the project, feeling it is <br /> too much rroney. <br /> e Mrs. Sh.i rey stated she does regret voting for the bridge in the first <br /> place but, on the other hand, she is concerned that the Public Service <br /> Building structure would not look complete if the bridge were not built. <br /> Cliff Culp, realtor, said that, when looking at the life expectancy of the <br /> buildings the bridge would serve, the expenditure for a bridge seems low <br /> per year. It would be a great time saver for city and county officials. <br /> Assistant Manager noted that, when Leoe officials and others rrove into the <br /> Public Service Building, the pedestrian traffic will increase substantially <br /> as w,i11 public parking underneath City Hall. <br /> Manager feels the project is a very desirable separation of pedestrian and <br /> vehicular traffic. Mid-block crossing interrupts traffic. <br /> Mayor Anderson commented he was not particularly enthusiastic about the <br /> bridge but would support it primarily for safety reasons. The courthouse <br /> and Ci ty Hall have become twice the traffic generators they were five years <br /> ago. With tire engines coming out of City Hall, bike paths, etc., a <br /> pedestrian bridge seems crucial for safety reasons. <br /> Mr. Murray feels it is a question of values. He sees many unmet needs other <br /> places in the city which are similar in nature - school crossings, etc. - <br /> and thinks some ot those needs should be addressed first. <br /> Mr. Hendershott, Attorney, commented that the cost of the bridge over the <br /> period of time it will be used is minimal. It bothers him, too, to see so <br /> e milch jaywalking (breaking of the law). Frankly, he said, why not abolish the <br /> law against jaywalking. Speaking to Mr. Murray's comments, he noted the <br /> City has all kinds of needs but the pedestrian structure will be used for <br /> 50-100 ye~rs and it seems cheaper to do it now than later. <br /> Mr. Williams expressed agreement with the advisability of separating pedestrians <br /> and t raft ic. <br /> Mr. Williams rroved seconded by Mr. flaws to approve the necessary <br /> addi tional funds for the new design for a pedestrian bridge between Comm <br /> the City and County. Vote was taken on the rrotion which carried, all 12/10/75 <br /> Council members present voting aye except Mr. Murray voting no. Approve <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Haws to place on a future Committee <br /> agenda discussion of the options and ramifications of repealing the <br /> jaywa.lking statute. Motion carried unanirrousl!j. <br /> D.Initiation of Improvement of 15th Street, Jefferson to Fairgrounds - Council has <br /> viewed the site on tour. It is a shabby looking section of street which is an <br /> important entrance to the fairgrounds. <br /> Mr. Murray wondered if there would be any possiblity of getting the County to <br /> share ~n the cost, Manager responding staff "could ask". <br /> Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mrs. Shirey to authorize staff to proceed. Comm <br /> Motion carried unanirrously. 12/10/75 <br /> . Approve <br /> 12/22/75 - 7 <br /> ~~() <br />