Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br />A short recess was taken, after which Councilwoman Shirey was <br />not present. <br /> <br />2. Planning Commission denial of code amendment to allow ambulance stations <br />in residential zones under conditional use permits (Leonard) <br /> <br />Planning Commission at its January 6, 1976 meeting on a 3-3 vote recom- <br />mended denial of the code amendment. <br /> <br />e' <br />II-A-I <br /> <br />Jim Saul, planner, explained that the ambulance service~ proposed in the South <br />Eugene area by Oregon Emergency Transportation Services (Eugene-Springfield <br />Ambulance) because of a requirement to meet Federal regulations of a five- <br />minute response time, were allowed only in the central business district, M-Z, <br />and M-3 zones, and permitted only as a conditional use in C-2 zones. In the <br />South Eugene area, properly zoned property is not available for a satellite <br />ambulance station, leaving the option of seeking C-2 property and applying for <br />a conditional use permit or requesting a code amendment to allow such stations <br />as a conditional use in residential areas. He said that staff recommended the <br />code amendment because it "made more sense." Ambulance services are similar <br />to other types of emergency services such as -fire and police stations, etc., <br />which are now permitted as outright uses in all residential zones. Also, <br />treating ambulance services as a conditional use would be preferable to out- <br />right rezoning of a specific site in a residential area. The standard con- <br />ditional use procedure calls for public hearings and adoption of findings <br />with regard to whether a particular site would be suitable for such use and <br />whether it would have a detrimental effect on surrounding properties. Mr.Saul <br />said the Planning Commission, after two public hearings on the issue, con- <br />sidered a motion to approve the amendment; however, the motion failed on a <br />3-3 tie vote, and this appeal was submitted from that action. He added that <br />technically there is no provision for appeal from denial of a code amendment. <br />In effect, Mr. Leonard, president of the Transportation Services, is request- <br />ing the Council to consider this legislation. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />. In response to Councilman Keller, Mr. Saul affirmed that Mr. Leonard was not <br />interested in any particular parcel as such, only in a code change. He said <br />there was extensive testimony in Planning Commission hearings with regard to <br />one property, but that was not the question in this request. This is whether, <br />generally, residential districts may accommodate ambulance stations. If the <br />code is changed, he said, the parcel discussed in Planning Commission meetings <br />may become the subject of a hearing latter on. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Bill Leonard, president of the Emergency Transportation Services, supported <br />the planning staff in its recommendation. He explained that the site at 29th <br />and Mill, the subject of Planning Commission discussions, had been abandoned <br />as a possible location for ambulance services unless there is a change of <br />public. sentiment against its use for that type of facility. He said other <br />sites in the South Eugene area will be considered if the amendment is adopted. <br /> <br />Speaking against the proposed amendment were Richard Grimes, 2880 Mill Street; <br />Floyd Summers, 2860 Mill Street; Merle Cole, 2885 Mill Street; and F. L. <br />Gifford, 2855 Mill Street. Mr. Grimes said he was concerned with the Friendly <br />Area neighborhood as well as the city at large and encroachment of commercial <br />type activities into residential areas. He also expressed concern for the <br />number of children attending schools who would be confronted with the in- <br />creased traffic. He thought consideration should be given to previous sug- <br />gestions for allowing ambulance services adjacent to or as part of existing <br />fire facilities. Mr. Summers,was opposed specifically to use of the site at <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2/9/76 - 8 <br /> <br />'70 <br />