02/23/1976 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. M I NUT E S EUGENE CITY COUNCIL February 23~ 1976 Adjourned meeting - from February 9, 1976 - of the Common Council of the city of Eugene, Oregon was called to order by His Honor Mayor Lester E. Anderson at 7:30 p.m. on Febru- ary 23, 1976 in the Council Chamber with the following Council members present: Gus Keller, Eric Haws, Wickes Beal, Tom Williams, Neil Murray, Ray Bradley, D.W.Hamel, and Edna Shirey. I - Public Hearings A. Withdrawing from Oakway Water District recently annexed area at northeast corner of Gilham Road and Crescent Avenue (BC FO 300) Routine action for withdrawing from the special district of an area recently annexed to the city. Public hearinf was held with no testimony presented. I-A-] Council Bill No. 1012 - Withdrawing from Oakway Water District area at northeast corner of Gilham Road and Crescent Avenue was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Keller moved second by Mr. Haws that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enact- ment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. e Mr. Keller moved second by Mr. Haws that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and nunbcred 17524. B. Appeals from Planning Commission denial of zone changes - January 6, 1976 1. Southwest corner of 19th and Jefferson - From R-I to C-l (LICO Corpora- tion)(Z 75-18) - fPpedlS from Planning Commdssion Denials of Zone Changes . Lico Corporation and Bonson Designers, appellants; Tax Lot 7200, 19th near Jefferson, Map 18-03-06-21, from Rl to C1. 2. Donald L. Frosland and Bonson Designers, appellants; Tax Lot 300, Chase Street North of Cross Street, from RA to M-2. Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to schedule a February 23 public hearing on the above zone change appeals. Motion carried unanimously. Comm 2/11/76 Pub Hrng Manager noted that the zone change request had been denied in Planning Commis- sion action on January 6, 1976 as the result of a tie vote. - Jim Saul, planner, explained that some years back a portion of the one tax lot on which zone change was requested had been rezoned to C-I, allowing develop- ment of a gas station. At the time of that rezoning, the zoning code allowed for transitional uses so the portion of the lot zoned R-l was developed as a parking lot for the gas station. Subsequent to that time, the gas station burned. Mr. Saul said that the C-I portion of the property could be used for residential purposes only as a conditional use in conjunction with commercial uses; C-1 uses are practically impossible because of setback requirements and ~3 2/23/76 - 1