Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley suggested that the Metro Plan Policy Co~ttee be charged with the <br />responsibility of making recommendations and that the other two committees simply <br />report to the Metro Plan Policy Co~ttee. Planning Director said that is the <br />basis on which it is hoped they will operate. <br /> <br />'Mr, Murray expressed dissatisfaction with Eugene being more financially responsible <br />for costs but having the same amount of votes. Mr. Williams, on the other hand, <br />feLt the structure would provide for all three groups working toward agreement <br />on a process universally acceptable to each. <br /> <br />Mrs. B~al' s most urgent objection is appointment of t~,o :l(d.: c-ion,';] U:,!.'!,_'s,'..'n::..1::' "'-.'" <br />by LCOG; she wondered how representatives of out.lyiIl':J F:<sc:.'i,,-t;:CllS ,-0:11(! i,.' <br />,concerned with the met!:o area. Perhaps a Council sub,:omlli':,,'e should fi~-st <br />study the suggested process, she said. <br /> <br />Mrs.Beal moved seconded by Mrs. Shirey to appoint ~ subco~ttee <br />composed of the Mayor, City Manager, Planning Director, Planning <br />commission Member, and two Council Members, to study the upd3te <br />structure, develop guidelines for the MPPC Council deLegate reporting <br />back to the Council, and bring a sub-co~ ttee report back to the <br />March 10 Committee-of-the-Whole meeting. <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/25/76 <br />'Approve <br /> <br />Mr. 'Bradley wondered if recommendations will be going to the respective <br />jurisdictions for review before going to Lcoe. Assistant Manager explCli ned <br />r recommendations are generally submitted to the LeOG Board for review and a <br />decision by Lcoe as to whether the plan is ready for release for public hea!:i~y - <br />LCOe does not decide on the merits of the proposals. Member agencies subsequently <br />develop any differences to be considered by those affected before LCGe <br />adoption. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion wh~ch carried unaniID0usly. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson appointed Mr. Keller and Mrs. Beal to serve on the sllb-co!TlITlitteE'~ <br /> <br />E. Resolution Suppcrting LEAP. Funding for Lane Inter-Agency Rape Team <br />Council has received memo from Human Rights Specialist dated February 20, 1976, <br />as well as copy of resolution proposed by the Women's Co~ssjon, ~long with a <br />letter sent to the Oregon Law Enforcement Council from the Lane County Taxpayers <br />Council. Manager noted receiving a petition signed by some 680 individuals <br />supporting continuation of the Lane Inter-Agency Rape Team. The all-woman <br />team consists of two detectives (one from Eugene Police and one from the Sheriffs <br />Office), a deputy DA and a public relations-education officer. Manager also <br />added the Eugene Police Department will continue to provide the service of its <br />female rape investigator who was acting in that capacity before creation ot" the <br />funded rape team project. Presumably that service will be continued through tr.e <br />end of the fiscal year. The immediate request is extension of the rape team <br />project for the next four months. <br /> <br />Therese Engelmann, Vice-President of the Women's Commission, said that group <br />heard a presentation from the rape team members, considered the matter and passed <br />a resolution supporting the continuance of the Lane Inter- Agency Rape Team <br />and urging the OLEC to ensure the team's continued existence by granting a <br />]-month extension and subsequent renewal of funds. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mrs. Shirey <br />Women's Co~ssion and to authorize the <br />the local match. <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/25/76 <br />Approve <br /> <br />to adopt the resolution of the <br />City to provide its share of <br /> <br />3/8/76 - 13 <br /> <br />t35 <br />