Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-- <br /> <br />Rape Team Funding Update - Mrs. Beal referred to the February 25 Committee <br />minutes, page 5, sentence reading, "Mrs. Beal felt that LCOG should be <br />requested to listen to a presentation from the Women's Commission on the <br />subject". She would like that sentence to read, "Mrs. Beal felt that the <br />two LCOG committees. . . If. She also wondered if a letter had been written <br />as yet requesting those two cOmnUttees to receive a delegation from the <br />Women's COmnUssion. Manager reported that letter was in the process of <br />being written. He also reported that the Oregon Law Enforcement Council <br />had flatly refused to provide $20,000 needed for the continuation of the <br />grant through the end of the fiscal year. However, the County Commissioners <br />have "today" agreed to expend over $9,000, contingent upon the City <br />participating in the amount of $4360, thus enabling continuation of the <br />project for three months - through May 31. <br /> <br />Assistant Manager noted that the Executive COmnUttee of OLEC decided not <br />to meet on the issue. It does appear the program could continue, however, <br />with County and City money while LCOG is in the process of re-evaluating <br />priorities, though the picture does not look optimistic on a long-term <br />basis. <br /> <br />Comm <br />3/3/76 <br />Approve <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal felt it was the sense of Council's earlier action that Council <br />places high priority on continuation of the Rape Team and that it wishes <br />that feeling expressed clearly in the letter to the LCOG committees. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />F. Authorization of Highway 99 Improvement Study - A February 10 memo from Planning <br />and Public Works and a chart showing the proposed process have been distributed <br />to Council. Planning Director noted an addition to the normal process - that is, <br />having citizen planning meetings and design criteria established before Public <br />Works proceeds with preliminary design phase and public hearing. Cost estimate <br />is about $590,000, of which $290,000 would be state dollars from the State <br />Highway bond issue, $200,000 in assessments and a city cost of $100,000. LCOG <br />has approved the $290,000 in bond issue priorities. <br /> <br />Mr. Keller moved seconded by Mr. Haws to authorize staff to proceed. <br /> <br />Corom <br />3/3/76 <br />Approve <br /> <br />A question was raised regarding the southern boundary of the improvement. <br />Planning Director responded the next six months' master planning will have <br />bearing on the most reasonable boundary. Public Works Director noted that <br />original intention was to improve the two-way portion up to the overpass. <br />a need develops for improvement farther south, for instance to include the <br />overpass, that could be determined before getting to the final stage. <br /> <br />more <br />the <br />If <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion which carried unanimously. <br /> <br />G. Appointments to Boards and COmnUssions of Residents Outside City - Mr. Murray <br />referred to discussion held at the time of Council appointments to boards and <br />cOmnUssions in January regarding appointment of residents outside the city <br />limits. Council had decided to wait until after the appointment process was <br />completed to further discuss that issue. Mr. Murray feels appointment should <br />be limited to city residents cOmnUtted to wanting to serve, and who represent <br />the taxpayer. His position, however, is not intended to affect those people <br />who are now serving who live outside the city limits. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Manager said that, on the other hand, appointment might be desired of a <br />resident outside the city limits but owning substantial property in the city. <br />Additionally, on some boards in which technical expertise is desirable, a <br />particularly well qualified individual might live outside the City. <br /> <br />131, <br /> <br />3/8/76 - 15 <br />