My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/12/1976 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1976
>
04/12/1976 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:58:42 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:16:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/12/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />neighborhood associations for an initiative petition to effect a Charter change <br />for a more equitable assessment procedure, and to support those people owning <br />property abutting Willamette between 39th and 50th in attempting to convince <br />the Council to more equitably assess the cost of this project and to reduce the <br />cost thereof through elimination of bike lanes and installation of sidewalk on <br />one side only. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson in response to Mr. Schulz' proposal for toll booth and Mr. Wiper's <br />concern about the cemetery property, proposed the title of "Pearly Gates" for <br />the entrance to the improved section of Willamette Street. <br /> <br />Mr. Allen noted Charter amendment that provided for assessment against properties <br />on both sides of the street for sidewalk installed on one side only. He said if <br />a sidewalk was installed on one side only and another was later determined neces- <br />sary on the other side, the new one could be built and also assessed against both <br />sides. He said that even thought the Willamette Street project had been bid twice <br />before, there had never been a formal remonstrance filed, it was simply a matter <br />of the Council's having decided not to proceed. He said the bid prices in 1968 <br />were $7.18 per front foot; in 1970, $13.38, so there was no question about an in- <br />flationary spiral on public works improvements. <br /> <br />Al Williams, traffic engineer, speaking with regard to comments on bike lanes, sug- <br />gested that lack of bikes in the South Willamette area now was not good criteria <br />for determining whether a bike facility should be installed. The primary purpose <br />of bike paths, he said, was to attract bikes and encourage their use. He said <br />the Bicycle Committee, in updating the Master Bikeway Plan, made the decision not <br />to remove this bike route from the overall network. Mr. Williams continued that <br />staff recommendation for installation of sidewalks on both sides of Willamette <br />was in line with direction to enhance pedestrian uses where possible. It seemed ~ <br />to him that uses on the west side of the street - the cemetery, church, etc. - ~. <br />would generate a certain amount of pedestrian traffic. <br /> <br />Mr. Allen explained that programs under which Federal or other agency funds could <br />be used for this project had been investigated. However, he reminded the Council <br />that even if Federal or County funds were used, the same general procedure would <br />have to be used to meet the cost - assessment to abutting properties for the <br />28-foot minimum width. Federal and County funds could not be used to increase <br />the subsidy to abutting properties, he said. <br /> <br />Manager asked whether adoption of the ordinances proposed for action at this meet- <br />ing would preclude any design changes in the project. Mr. Allen thought provi- <br />sions of the ordinances were broad enough to allow the design to proceed in line <br />with testimony presented at this meeting. He said that would be taken into con- <br />sideration in the final design. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 1087 - Paving Willamette Street from 40th Avenue to <br />600 feet south of Coachman Drive was read by <br />council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present <br />requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Keller moved second by Mr. Haws that the bill be read the second time by <br />council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enact- <br />ment be considered at this time. <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley asked whether a two-thirds vote of the Council would be re- <br />quired to override the objections presented. Mr. Allen answered that a formal <br />remonstrance would have to be filed before the tWQ-thirds majority would be <br />required. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4/12/76 - 8 <br /> <br />),g,t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.