|
<br />hardship on the property owner. And the additional cost to residents opposing
<br />the annexation was relatively small compared to the advantages to the city.
<br />Mr. Freeman said people opposing annexation did so primarily because of
<br />.anticipated construction of multiple-family housing. They would not object
<br />he said, if the land was developed in single-family homes, and his plans were
<br />for single-family development that would not interfere with the present
<br />character of the area.
<br />
<br />III-A-4
<br />
<br />--e
<br />
<br />Walter Sands, 1121 Balboa Street; Beverly Prociw, 133 Holly Avenue; Kenneth
<br />Rodakowski, 1178 Tulip Street; Stan Shattuck, 1197 Tulip Street; and Ken
<br />Stickler, 2898 Norkenzie Road, spoke against annexation. Their objections were
<br />based primarily on the lack of adequate streets to handle the anticipated added
<br />traffic, the uncertainty of the actual type of housing that would develop, the
<br />absence of real need for the annexation, and the anticipated added financial
<br />burden if annexed. Ms. Prociw asked if they would have the right to expand
<br />their greenhouse if their property was annexed. Also, whether it would be
<br />necessary to extend a trunk sewer line across their business property to
<br />serve the area.
<br />
<br />III-A-S
<br />III-A-6
<br />
<br />Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented.
<br />
<br />Mr. Saul, in response to the question about greenhouses, said truck farming,
<br />orchards, nurseries, etc., were allowed as outright uses under RA zoning.
<br />Greenhouses were considered an accessory use, so they would be permitted.
<br />With regard to the sewer line, Don Allen, public works director, took note
<br />of the east/west sewer on Crescent Avenue designed to serve property within
<br />160 feet. Whether another lateral would be needed, he said, would have to be
<br />determined at the time the overall system was designed.
<br />
<br />There being no further discussion, the issue was held over to
<br />the May 10, 1976 Council meeting.
<br />
<br />-..../
<br />e
<br />
<br />II - Items acted upon with one motion after consideration of individual items as requested.
<br />Previously discussed in committee on April 14 (Present: Mayor Anderson; Council
<br />members Keller, Haws, Beal, Williams, Murray, Bradley, Hamel, and Shire) and April 21,
<br />1976 (Present: Mayor Anderson; Council members Keller, Haws, Beal, Williams, Murray,
<br />Bradley, Hamel, and Shirey). Minutes of those meetings appear below printed in italics.
<br />
<br />A. wrecker's License - W.F. Tieman, 2750 Roosevelt.slvd.
<br />Manager advised the si te was originally thought to be in a zone that would not
<br />permi t the operation. Staff has since determined the location is in the proper
<br />M-3 zoning and is therefore recommending processing and forwarding to the State
<br />for consideration.
<br />
<br />Gene Haxton, Zo~ing Administrator, advised the area is not enclosed by a sight
<br />obscuring fence in the manner the State requests but conditional approval could
<br />be granted since, in conversation with the applicant, Mr. Haxton has determined
<br />the applicant did not intend to engage in on-si te sal vage operations but rather move.
<br />wrecks from one point to another. The State requires a license even for that type
<br />of operation.
<br />
<br />Mr. Keller lOOved seconded by Mr. Williams to recommend approval.
<br />Motion carried unanilOOusly.
<br />
<br />Comm
<br />4/14/76
<br />Approve
<br />
<br />B.Liquor License - Pizza Aurelio - 2890 Willamette - Change of Ownership - Restaurant
<br />Burell Restaurant, Inc. - Oscar Ray Burell, applicant.
<br />
<br />Mr. Keller lOOved seconded by Mr. Williams to recommend approval. .
<br />Motion carried unanilOOusly.
<br />
<br />...J
<br />Corom ~
<br />4/14/76 __
<br />Approve .
<br />
<br />4/26/76 - 12
<br />
<br />d..ak
<br />
|