Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Haws moved second by Mr. Murray to deny the appeal and adopt by <br /> reference thereto findings supporting denial of rezoning the southwest <br /> corner of 19th and Jefferson to C-l <br />Councilman Keller asked for clarification of procedure, noting that the ordinance _- <br />which would have rezoned the property had been held on second reading. Mr. Long <br />explaineq that the Council had the obligation to dispose of the issue in one way <br />or another. The motion to rezone failed, which does not mean the opposite result <br />follows. The next motion to deny the rezoning carried as did the mo,tion to pre- <br />pare negative findings. If the motion now before the Council fails, he said, then <br />another motion would be needed. <br />Councilman Williams declared his intent to abstain because he had not been present <br />at all of the meetings at which this issue was discussed, nor had he reviewed the <br />minutes and testimony presented. <br />Councilman Bradley asked whether the current motion was appropriate in view of the <br />previous motion to "approve denial." He wondered whether the motion should be only <br />to support the denial by adopting findings. Mr. Long said it had been pointed out <br />to the Council that a motion approving or denying rezoning unaccompanied by findings <br />is, in effect, no motion at all. At that time, staff was directed to prepare nega- <br />tive findings for consideration by the Council, and it is now incumbent upon the <br />Council to dispose of the matter either on those findings or by requesting prepara- <br />tion of Others. <br />Further discussion took place between Councilman Bradley and Mr. Long with regard <br />to legal procedure in disposing of the rezoning request, whether the findings pre- <br />sented could be adopted, or whether a motion was necessary to reconsider previous <br />action. No further or substitute motion was offered. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion to deny the appeal and adopt findings _-- <br /> supporting the denial of rezoning. Motion carried - Council members <br /> Haws, Beal, Murray, Bradley, and Shirey voting aye; Council members <br /> Keller and Hamel voting no; Councilman Williams abstaining. <br />III - Items acted upon with one motion after discussion of individual items as requested. <br />Previously discussed in committee'on June 2 (Present: Mayor Anderson; Council <br />members Keller, Haws, Beal, Williams, Murray, Bradley, Hamel, and Shirey) and <br />June 9, 1976 (Present: Mayor Anderson; Council members Keller, Haws, Beal, Williams, <br />Murray, Bradley, Hamel, and Shirey). Minutes of those meetings appear below <br />printed in italics. <br />A. Appointments <br /> 1. MAPAC - Council subcommi ttee, composed of members Murray, Hamel and Shirey, <br /> met and reviewed applications. Resulting recommendations were: <br /> Reappointment of Mary Sherriffs and appointment of Robert Robertson and <br /> Stephen Wood to fill terms ending June 30, 1979, and Nancy Hindman to <br /> fill balance of term ending June 30, 1978. Alternate recommended was <br /> Duane Shears. Corom <br /> 6/2/76 <br /> Mr. Murray moved seconqed by Mr. Hamel to appoint as Approve <br /> recommended. Motion cqrried unanimously. <br /> 2. Eugene Renewal Agency - One vacancy to be filled by Council after review <br /> of applications only. . <br /> Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to reappoint incumbent <br /> 6/2/76 <br /> Harry Farrell. Motion carried unanimously. Approve <br /> . <br />6/14/76 - 10 <br /> A<<\1 <br />