<br /> Councilwoman Beal pointed out that some conditional use permits would be disastrous
<br /> for this area - a parking lot, for instance. She said there was a great deal of
<br /> precedent for moratoriums, but only when refinement studies were underway, as ln
<br /> this case. Councilman Murray suggested that staff should bring a list of cri-
<br /> teria to the Council along with the ordinance effecting the moratorium, this list .
<br /> to cover the gist of the Council discussion.
<br />Vote was taken on the motion to approve a moratorium as stated.
<br />Motion carried - Council members Keller, Haws, Beal, Murray, and
<br />Hamel voting aye; Council members Williams and Bradley voting no;
<br />Councilwoman Shirey abstaining.
<br />F. Bids
<br /> ~arks Department - Lighting in Skinner Butte Park
<br /> Turf at Edison School (opened June 9, 1976)
<br /> Lighting Clarke Electric $ 2,226.00
<br /> Builders Electric 2,179.40
<br /> Scofield Electric 1,997.00
<br /> Lane Electric 1,874.00
<br /> Hamilton Electric 1,768.92
<br /> Office Estim~te $ 1,920.00
<br />Turf Base Bid Al t. #1 Total
<br />- Wi1dish Construction $ 19,842.90 $ 2,200.00 $ 22,042.90
<br /> Shurway Contractors 19,085.00 4,850.00 23,935.00
<br /> JOB Landscaping 14,738.50 3,750.00 18,488.50
<br /> *Emerald Landscaping 14,635.00 750.00 15,385.00
<br /> *This bid not accepted for lack of bid bond and failure
<br /> to list line item costs on bid form. e-
<br /> Office Estimate 13,020.00 1,350.00 14,370.00
<br /> . Manager reviewed bids. Staff recommended contract award to the low bidder
<br /> on each of the projects.
<br />Public hearing was held with no testimony presented.
<br />Mr. Keller moved second by Mr. Haws to award contracts to the
<br />low bidders on each of the projects, that on turf at Edison
<br />School awarded on the base bid only. Rollcall vote. Motion
<br />carried, all Council members present voting aye.
<br /> 2. Public Works Department - Various Improvement Projects (opened June 8, 1976)
<br /> Cost to f'\r...~:lt
<br />~am.. ~! Bidder and Project Contract Cost Abutting Prop. C.:llt to City Budseted
<br /> P.Wt~;r., 5A'\I:-.-\~'( sr.~F:n l. STORM Sf,'rJER:
<br /> 1. ".Iith1n 2nd Addition to panor-ama View and ~anitary
<br />sel.\'<!t' anc s:orr-. sewer to serve property withtn
<br />160' of L-.. 100Hh houndary of 2nd Addition to
<br />P.1norac-& \"!e'" (1247)
<br />I, Ulldis~ C~~str-uct[nn Co.,........................... ..$142,1'0. ~O.............. ..... .28' 'av,...... .$19.25/P'F.....,....... 0...... ,.. .'0....... .0.......
<br />2. rugI'M S.lnd 6 Gravel. Inc.............................$156.419.95 36' P...,........$22.J5/H
<br />3. Dan A.!sup Ct)ntractor. Inc............................$164.969.50 San. Lat.......$ a.13/SF
<br />4. Kl'n Bostic',(, Construction Company..................... .$116,089.65 San. Serv..... .$98.00/EA
<br /> Storm Se.wor.. $695.00/Lot
<br /> COMPLETIO:i DAtE:: Septemher U. 1976
<br /> 2. \..'Ithln Velko~Jten Park and sanitary and ~torm
<br />se\o1ers to serve propcrty within 160' of the
<br />north .r.d ",est bound,Hies of Velkollllllen Park. e
<br />(1199)
<br /> ~ Al.TERNAT! 1510
<br />1., Eur.ene Sand 6. Cravel. Inc........... .No Bid.............. .&66,429.80...... ......... .28' P4V....., .$17.85/FF............... .0............ t...'.,.. .0......
<br />2. Wlldist- Co;,structlon Coa'pany........$67.907.86............$66.822.10 . San. Lat......$ a.OB/SF
<br />J. Babh Construction Co. db4...........$69.971.8~..q........No Biel San. Serv... .SI90.Da/EA
<br />Delta Co:utcuct{on StorlD Sewer. $85.00/Lot
<br /> 4. Ken SOHick COnstruction Company....No Bld......."........71.956.20
<br /> COHPLETION DATe: hptclrlbu". 1976
<br />6/14/76 - 8
<br /> 1.'\5
<br />
|