06/28/1976 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

single parent and there is no need for further documentation of need. The commdttee should receive advice on mdnimum design standards and social e services to be provided. Mayor Anderson felt it should be emphasized that the Joint Housing Committee "-' throughout the year has been informal and open to everyone. He does not think there is need to set up channels of communication. Mrs. Beal thought perhaps Council should direct staff to respond to Mrs. Milhaupt's group suggesting they attend Joint Housing Committee meetings and using that avenue which is always open to them. Comm As there were no objections, Chair ordered that staff send such a 6/16/76 communication. Affirm W. CETA Title VI Legislation - The Board of County commissioners "this morning" passed a resolution relative to CETA Title VI legislation going to Congress "torrnrrow" . Copies of that resolution were distributed to Council. Commissioner Bob Wood said the County hoped that the City Council would take simdlar action supporting the extension of CETA Title VI emergency jobs legislation. They urge communication by wire or phone with Senators Hatfield and Packwood. Comm As there were no objections, Chair ordered a supportive wire be 6/16/76 sent to both Senators Hatfield and Packwood. Affirm x. Planning Department Services - Mrs. Beal requested staff response on rroney - spent on planning functions not covered by fees. Comm .~ 6/23/76 It was understood a report would be brought back. Affirm Y. Zone Change Decisions - Mr. Murray asked for staff response on the Supreme Court decision regarding the public's right to reverse zone change decisions Comm made by public officials. It was understood staff would respond shortly. 6/23/76 Affirm Z. Metropolitan Plan POlicy Committee Meeting - Mr. Bradley reported that, at the June 10 meeting of the MPPC, the year 2000 was tentatively selected as Comm the target date. The committee also passed a resolution requesting that 6/16/76 the State Land Conservation and Development Commission take action on the File joint application of Eugene, Springfield and Lane County. AA. Regional Corrections Facility - Mr. Bradley requested staff response on the progress of a regional corrections facility., He wondered about consideration of the feasibility of a city jail~due to approval of a corrections facility by a large percentage of voters in the city limits. It was understood discussion of a "city" jail would be Comm 6/16/76 scheduled on a Commdttee agenda. File Lane County Jail Funding Alternatives - Manager noted that the County intends to resubmdt a jail proposal at the November election. In the meantime, alternatives will be considered, e.g. eliminating certain features of the present proposal or incorporating the present jail into the planning. Staff - feels the County is taking the proper action at this time. --- Mr. Bradley wondered about reasons behind transfer of the jail to the County two years ago. Asst. Manager explained that, since it is a regional facility, 6/28/76 - 19 33a