|
<br />C:;:~.::!:,vn ~-'i:.~' .--- -----
<br />B. 23th .1:;e"Il;~ t!'c~ :.;') !~et eAst of
<br /> cteve~a~d ~:ree: :0 320 :eec ea,:
<br /> vithic 2nu nCditio~ to :.a<n S~,divl.lon.
<br /> (278)
<br /> .~;)r'" Cce.n [, ,0'"..............................$7.957.25.:.......................San Lat....$ 0.125/5?" .................0...................0...
<br /> . S:"',..,'a:: Contc!::or. be........................ 8,386.70 San Serv... 435.00/EA .
<br /> 3. X<;;1 :.::;::.:'< ":::-S':r-.;c::.O!\ Co....................10,744.50
<br /> 4. J.A. i::::..................................... .10.7'16.91
<br /> 5. ~:::d1s.- ~~:1~:':'..;:tio:-. .:0........................11.337.00
<br /> 6. :u;one S.'".d i" Cco-:e!, In<.......... ........... . 13.5B1.00 COI1PLETIOll DATE Ausu.~ 21). 1976
<br />P;-JI~;G Oo;:,;X,:
<br />9. Seve~ ';ario\ls lo:..at~o:'ts
<br /> (::23)
<br /> 1. <\::.no S.~d ;. ~:~'Jel, Ir.<........ -... -. -...... .$9!.,696.27....................... _.. .0.......... ................... ..$94,696.27...... .$108,000.00
<br /> 2. ~"lcls:- :ons::-c:C1o~ Co........................IOS.228.17
<br /> 3. ~~crso "cos.. :cc............................ ...IOB. 737.95
<br /> COMPLETIOll DAT~ Oetooer I, 1976
<br /> ----
<br /> July 8, 1976
<br /> Cos t to A::'1ount
<br /> tra:::e 'J~ 3:.,::er a':'.~ Pro~!::': CO:1tract Cost Abutting Pro? Co.t to City Budgete
<br />'.\':~':r.. S....:.~~;.~':. ~\.~:~ :. s:--:-" S:.'.'-:'):
<br />, ~ithi~ c~~c~':'~ ?!::; ~~~ 5a,i!~ry ~ew~~ ~ithin
<br /> ISO fe~: o~ :"e S~~:~ ~-d ed!t ~ou~~arie5 of
<br /> CO:1':'J:'C ?~2.: I ~ -"
<br /> ...'.J
<br /> MSIC Aln:,':ATE
<br /> .. ~', ! < S. '. -- ,,~ :: CO" C,............ $ 121,4 7A. 81. .. . $ 123. 100.26.. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. 28' Pav......... 5 15.70/"............... 0.. .. . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . .0.. .. .
<br /> 2. :'0.1 J:;:::< C: ':"'ct:~, Ce........ 124.051.61.... ::0 3id 36' Pav......... i9.50/::
<br /> 3. :-:~:~.~ :::'-.~: -':':.. ~- ::,. cha
<br /> >Ita ~..,:~..~:i=c............... 125.951.30.... ~:~ Bid San La t. . . . . . . . . 0.II/S?
<br /> 4. ..~;,,:!:-' ~ :. c . .~.:-.::. :::':.......... :Jo Bid .... 126.3~6.92 San Serv........ 215.en!::;,
<br /> Strm Sur........ 750.00/t0!
<br /> e COCIPLCTIO:; ~..\Tt: . Cetol:er 1. 1976 I
<br /> Don Allen, public I,orks director, reviewed the bids, Contract alvard \,as recommended on
<br /> the low bid on each of the projects, No. 3 (Fir land Heights) 31v3rd on the low alternate
<br /> bid and subject to approval of the suhdivider and No. S (Edgewood Mountain II) subject to
<br /> approval of the subdivider. Mr. Allen explained that Schedule B and Alternate 1 on Item S
<br /> were portions of the project on private contract and did not inVOlve the city.
<br /> With regard to the change order on the Ferry Street Bridge project, Mr. Allen explained
<br /> that it \,a s brought to the Council since it involved increasing the contract by more than
<br /> 10% - $19,224 for a total contract cost including the increase of $168,039.20. The change
<br /> involves \iidening the access ramp sidewalk to the south concrete approach section of the
<br /> bridge and could more efficiently be handled under the existing contract. He said the bid
<br /> was a good one and recommended its approval, saying the bicycle committee had given its
<br /> approval and funds were budgeted to cover the cost.
<br /> Public hearing was opened.
<br /> Jim Johnson, 2SS0~ Chambers Street, asked why his property would be assessed for the
<br /> Nordian Park project (It em 2) when he already had connection to city se;iers. Mr. Allen
<br /> explained that the former OImer of t-lr. Johnson's property had petitioned this sewer.
<br /> The property was connected to a city sewer, he said, but an asseSS~ent had never been
<br /> made against the property.
<br /> e Public hearing was closed there being no further testimony presented.
<br /> 7/12/76 - 5
<br /> 350
<br />
|