My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/09/1976 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1976
>
08/09/1976 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 12:56:24 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:18:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/9/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Also that the most important consideration was to maintain the integrity of the <br /> urban service boundary. The south hills were compared to the east hills where <br /> development has occurred over the past 85 years with the comment that development <br /> It in the south hills would occur much more quickly because of the rapidly growing <br /> population in the urban area, growth that would be costly in terms of services to <br /> new developments. <br /> William Carlstrom, 1091 West Broadway, said that he would like to see a larger <br /> acquisition program presented to the voters. He also favored presentation of <br /> related economic factors to the voters so that they could judge whether they \ianted <br /> roads and amore efficient transportation system, parks, development of a denser <br /> core area, etc. <br /> Brian Obie, 2560 West 27th Avenue, agreed that the voters should have the opportunity <br /> to choose whether they felt the acquisition could be supported from a financial <br /> standpoint. He also urged the Council to present portions deleted from the original <br /> bond issue - the development program - as a separate measure along with this serial <br /> levy proposal. He said Eugene was in dire need of "people" oriented public facili- <br /> ties - for the handicapped, juvenile groups, swimming pools, etc. - and they should <br /> be included on the ballot as an alternative or an adjunct to the park land acquisi- <br /> tion proposal. Mr. Obie urged that the proposal go to the voters at the November 2 <br /> election. This, he said, would provide an opinion from the greatest number of <br /> voters since more people turn out for a general election than any other type of <br /> election. <br /> Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented. <br /> Council Bill No. 1212 - Calling special election September 21, 1976 <br /> e re: Parks Land Acquisition and autohrizing <br /> $5 million, 15-year serial levy, was read by council bill number and title <br /> only, there being no Council member present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> Mr. Haws moved second by Mr. Murray that the bill be read the second time by <br /> council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enact- <br /> ment be considered at this time. <br /> Councilman Williams wondered if it would be wise to delay action on this referral <br /> to the voters until it was known, whether the Charter would be ready for presentation <br /> at a September 21 election. He was concerned that a series of special elections <br /> might result if this was referred September 21, then it was found the Charter would <br /> have to go to a later election. Manager noted another hearing scheduled for <br /> August 16 on the charter at which time it possibly would be decided whether to take <br /> it to the voters in September. Councilman Murray said he would rather work more <br /> intensively on the charter so as to have it ready to go to the voters on September 21 <br /> with the parks land acquisition measure, this because of the length of time the <br /> parks issue had been delayed to date. Councilwoman Shirey agreed that the parks <br /> issue should go ahead as soon as possible. She asked when the charter would be voted <br /> upon if it didn't make the September 21 election. Manager answered that it could go <br /> to the Novembet election. I f so, then there would be an opportunity for the Council <br /> on August 23 to make its decision. September 2, he said, was the deadline for putting <br /> issues on the November 2 ballot. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion for second reading. Motion carried unanimously <br /> it and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> Mr. Haws moved second by Mr. Murray that the bill be approved and given <br /> final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, <br /> the bill was declared passed and numbered 17730. <br /> 8/9/76 - 9 <br /> 3~5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.