09/13/1976 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Don Fisher, 585 Fair Oaks Drive, speaking on his own behalf, said he circulated a petition. Within two or three blocks, e virtually every home opposed the request. He is certain almost any doctor in town would want to locate on the property, being bordered on two sides by residential plus the golf course. He felt that, with space downtown, it would be a shame to allow introduction of more commercial interests. Regarding traffic, he felt that would have to be addressed sooner or later regardless of the proposed development. He noted the traffic now is not a 9 to 4 p.m. problem. Rather, it starts about 7:30 a.m. and ends about 6 p.m. He suggested the traffic problem was severe. Chris lJhrbrand, 2181 Eastwood Lane, supported Mr. Fisher's comments. Traffic is really bad Monday through Sunday, he said, and Eastwood is llsed as a shortcut. Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented. Mr. Saul said staff notes submitted do contain a lengthy analysis and Planning Commission minutes contain an analysis on the public need issue. lIe noted that the issue of eliminating clinics from R-3 districts is not being pursued. ~Ir . Keller moved, seconded by Mr. Haws, to uphold Planning Commission's denial and incorporate findings of July 13 Planning Commission minutes. Jl10tion carried e unanimously. D. Rezoning I-B-3 ~-Northwest corner of Gilham Road and Brewer Lane, from R^ to R^-SR (Sprad I in) (Z 76-22) Recommended by Planning Commission July 13, 1976. The applicant, accordi ng to Mr. Saul, had indicated intent to develop property with four units. The Planning Commission recommendation includes a provision that development be limited to four units. No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Council members. Staff notes and minutes of July 13, 1976 were received as part of the record by reference thereto. Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. C.B. 1231 - Rezoning to RA-SR area at northwest corner of Gilham Road and Brewer Lane was read by number and title only, there bcin~ no Council member prescnt requesting it be read in full. ,- Haws that findings Mr. Keller moved, seconded hy Mr. supporting the rezoning as set out in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of July 13, 1976 he adopted hy e reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by counc i I hi 11 number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, Jnd that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bi 11 was read the second time by council bill number only. L[Lio Minutes c,:J/13/7{" -- 5 .-