Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Council Bill 1293 - Levying assessments for paving Sarah Lane from Bonnie <br /> View Drive to 200 feet north (76-3)(1209) was read by council bill number <br /> e and title only. <br /> ~ <br /> Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel that Council Bill No. 1293 be <br /> approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members <br /> present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 17813. <br /> Council Bill 1294 - Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer and storm <br /> sewer within Royal View Subdivision (76-13) (1231). was read by council bill <br /> number and title only. <br /> Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel that Council Bill 1294 be <br /> approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All council members <br /> present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and number 17814. <br /> Council Bill 1287 - Amending City Code re: allowing duplexes, triplexes, and <br /> fourplexes as outright uses in RA and R-l zones on certain lot sizes was <br /> read by council bill number and title only, there being no council member <br /> present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> The matter was heard before council a month ago. In the interim staff was <br /> asked to provide certain information. Discussion was held at the December 8 <br /> Co~ittee of the Whole meeting and it was decided to hold further discussion <br /> "tonight". Mr. Saul, Planner, presented a report dated December 6, 1976, <br /> responding to questions raised by council at the public hearing and recommending <br /> approval of the proposed amendment with the following modifications: <br /> e "I. Requirement of submission of proof that either the property had <br /> been vacant for five years or, if a residential structure on it had '-'" <br /> been demolished within that time, the demolition had resulted <br /> from an abatement order; and <br /> 2. The requirement that development occurring under these provisions <br /> would be subject to Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code. <br /> While the staff does not recommend the following modifications, the <br /> Council may also wish to consider: <br /> I. Limiting the applicability of the amendment to lots presently <br /> vacant (eliminating lots presently developed with 1 residence); and <br /> 2. Eliminating provision for fourplex development." <br /> Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel that the bill be read the second <br /> time by council bill number and title only, with unanimous consent of <br /> the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried <br /> unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number <br /> only. <br /> Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel that the bill be approved and given <br /> final passage. <br /> e Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Haws to amend the motion to include <br /> a requirement of submission of proof that either the property had been '-'" <br /> vacant for five years or, if a residential structure on it had been <br /> demolished within that time, the demolition had resulted from an <br /> abatement order. Motion carried, all council members present voting <br /> aye except Mr. Hamel voting no. <br /> lo03 12/13/76 - 19 <br /> ~~ <br />