Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel to deny the appeal of the merchant <br />police license and uphold the Police Department recommendation. <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley wondered if the applicant, Mr. Ackley, could indicate <br />his reasons why the information was not submitted. Mr. Ackley replied at <br />the time he applied, he did not have sufficient time to fill out the <br />application the night he was hired. He indicated he had no intention to <br />leave out the information, but by the time he returned back to complete <br />the information on the application, his employer had already sent it <br />on to the Police Department. <br /> <br />Councilman Haws indicated that since the applicant could re-apply at a <br />later date, he felt it best at this time for the public safety for that <br />reconsideration be done at a later time. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion which carried, with all Council members <br />present voting aye and Mr. Bradley voting no. <br /> <br />I-A-4 <br /> <br />E. No Through Trucks--Royal-Elmira-Roosevelt. <br /> <br />Manager indicated that at a November 3, 1976 Committee-of-the-Whole <br />meeting the City Council had called a public hearing for November 22 on <br />the proposed limitation of trucks through the Royal-Elmira-Roosevelt <br />area. He indicated this was a very difficult problem and at the November <br />22 public hearing there were not specific enough proposals, so the Public <br />Works Department was asked for time to come up with more specific <br />proposals. He indicated although staff was tardy in distributing the <br />proposal, the Council should have before them copies from the Public Works <br />Traffic Division with three alternatives for Council consideration. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Darrell Wilburn, Traffic Division, indicated this problem had gone back <br />to mid-1973, when the Public Works Department had received requests <br />from citizens in the area regarding the truck traffic, and their inquiry <br />into the problem indicated the truck traffic amounted to only ten per <br />cent, which was about normal then. However, by 1975, there had been <br />a considerable increase in truck traffic and the Active Bethel Citizens <br />group had again requested the City to look at the problem. Mr. Wilburn <br />said several solutions had been looked at, including closing all motor <br />truck traffic. The Police Department brought to the Public Works atten- <br />tion that this restriction would be unreasonable and extremely difficult <br />to enforce from a public relations standpoint. He indicated another <br />solution considered was prohibition by weight, but this would not be <br />practical, because in order for the posted weight to be effective it would <br />have to be unrealistically low and would cause a large number of legiti- <br />mate vehicles to be in violation and subject to a citation, i.e., those <br />serving the residential area in one way or another. Another considera- <br />tion was prohibition of logging trucks but that was felt not to be <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />1/24/77 - 5 <br /> <br />~I <br />