Laserfiche WebLink
<br />been transferred from outside the area, thus, making this <br />particular argument of using the labor force in Eugene a <br />rather weak one. She said there was serious doubt Data Gen- <br />eral would provide jobs for the people living in this area <br />now, that the unemployment problem will not be solved. She <br />said the economic costs would be very high, and growth on <br />farmland is too high a cost for the public to pay. She urged <br />opposition. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Jon Wostmann, 10 Jefferson Street, said he owned a tract of <br />land adjacent to the proposed annexed area. He questioned <br />the use of this agricultural land for residential area, <br />stating that with 3,000 acres inside the city limits available <br />for development, that should be used first. He urged the <br />City Council, since planning was underway, to deal with expan- <br />sion, hold off until the plans are completed, then assess <br />more clearly if it is necessary to sacrifice agricultural <br />lands for a housing development. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />David Waffle, 546 Polk Street, indicated he felt it would <br />cost the city too much to develop this area into housing; <br />he urged denial of the rezoning and annexation, and asked <br />the City Council to stop leap-frogging annexation and fill <br />in the land within the city. <br /> <br />Will Carlstrom, 1091 West Broadway, indicated he felt the <br />information presented in testimony had been overwhelming. <br />He said that he felt the information was saying that, yes, <br />the city was going to be able to make some more money and <br />retain interest in big labor and big business. He said he <br />felt the City Council should take caution in its actions in <br />this rezoning and annexation. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Daniel Go1drich, 2262 Birch Lane, said that he had some con- <br />cerns; the street-carrying capacity in Eugene; what Eugene <br />citizens' preference would be in relation to growth; and the <br />need for jobs which would meet Eugene's residents' needs. <br />He questioned development would meet this need for jobs. <br /> <br />Tom Bowerman, 1370 East 25th, said he felt this was good <br />farmland and should not be paved over for industrial and <br />housing uses. He urged the City Council to consider this <br />issue and the future of Eugene.. He said there was a diver- <br />sity needed, but perhaps soil farms rather than suburban <br />sprawl would be the answer. <br /> <br />David Filer, 235 East 3rd Avenue, said he felt the City Council <br />has an obligation to look at the future of Eugene, indicating <br />he did not want Eugene to be "Californicated." He said by <br />taking prime agriculture land and converting it to residential <br />and industrial uses, there would be a high cost to all in <br />the city, and he was opposed to the annexation. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2/28/77--12 <br /> <br />tlf8 <br />