Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Com 3/9/77 <br />Pub Hrg <br /> <br />Com 3/9/77 <br />Pub Hrg <br /> <br />Com 3/9/77 <br />File <br /> <br />Com 3/9/77 VI. <br />Pub Hrg <br /> <br />Com 3/9/77VII. <br />Pub Hrg <br /> <br />B. Vacation of Public Utility Easements <br />1. Ellison & Platz--located between Happy Lane and Russet <br />Drive (EV 76-6)(Assessor's Map 17-03-19-2-1) <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2. EWEB--Located between Harlow Road and Roan Drive <br />(EV 76-8)(Assessor's Map l7-03-28-2-2) <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to set public <br />hearings for the vacation of public utility easements, <br />April ll, 1977. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />C. Annexation Request <br />1. Marnold J. Smith--annexation of a parcel consisting of <br />approximately 6.9 acres located along the west side of <br />Gilham Road north of Crescent Avenue (A 76-l7)(Tax Lots <br />202 and 205--Assessor's Map 17-03-l7-2-3) <br /> <br />2. Bob Meltebeke--Annexation of a parcel consisting of <br />approximately 11.9 acres located south of Centennial <br />Boulevard, east ,of Alton Baker Park, and west of the <br />Chevy Chase Subdivision (A 76-l8)(Tax Lots 100 and <br />300--Assessor's Map 17-03-33-2-1) <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to schedule public <br />hearings March 14, 1977. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />D. Withdrawal of Proposed Interim Design Criteria for <br />East Butte Area <br />Manager indicated this was for Council's information only, <br />and that the Interim Design proposal had been withdrawn. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Appeal of Denial of Ambulance Driver and Attendant License <br />wilford Byrd--appellant. Memo and applicable section of Code <br />distributed to Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to schedule <br />public hearing for March 14, 1977. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Review of Proposed Water Extension PoI icy <br />Proposed revision to policy distributed to Council February 28, <br />1977. Mr. Chenkin, Planning Department, explained to Council <br />that the revision to the City policy is not a new one, simply a <br />refinement of the one which has been in operation for some years. <br />He said the major revision would be in the defining of a health <br />hazard, which would require the health hazard to be a communicable <br />disease hazard. He said with Boundary Commission approval service <br />would stilI be available to properties outside the city, but within <br />the urban service boundary provided: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3/14/77 - 34 <br /> <br />A,30 <br />