Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'- <br /> <br />achieve the 1990 Plan. He noted the City needed that flexi- <br />bility. He said it was not the intent of the mixed-use district <br />to take existing zones and bunch them together, but to make spe- <br />cific zones in a particular area. He said there was a preponder- <br />ance of residential with some mix, and the mixed-use would provide <br />certain types of uses in that area. <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley noted that he would like to delay passage of this proposal <br />to see what those developements might be. Mr. Delay noted he was in <br />favor of the new mixed-use zoning district, citing that it was simply <br />an enabling ordinance, and would be up to the City Council to address <br />the specific problems as they come before Council. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion which carried with all Council <br />members present voting aye, except Mr. Bradely voting no. Lacking <br />unanimous consent, final reading was held to March 28, 1977. <br /> <br />1-B-10 <br /> <br />D. Appeal denial ambulance driver and attendant license--Wilford Byrd <br />Manager noted staff was exploring possible ways for processing appeals <br />of denials of licenses rather than having them held at a full Council <br />meeting. He also said information regarding this particular item as <br />to why the application had been turned down had been distributed to <br />Council. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Wilford Byrd, of 975 West 7th Avenue, gave a background review of his <br />imprisonment in Illinois and the training received to become a medical <br />technician. He had been licensed in the state of Illinois and also by <br />the State of Oregon, but had been denied a license locally. He said <br />he is qualified to be an attendant ambulance driver, and felt that his <br />criminal record should not be reason for denial of this license. <br />He had been working very hard to get where he is now in training <br />himself for employment. He wants to work at the profession of <br />his own choice and for which he is qualified. <br /> <br />Andy Clement, City of Eugene Human Rights Specialist, spoke as a <br />representative of the Minorities Commission. The Commission had a <br />general concern of the type of appeal and action on the part of the <br />Eugene Police Department. The Commission did not feel a conviction <br />record would be a reflection of moral fitness, which was one basis of <br />the City Code used for denying licenses. Mr. Clement said convictions <br />could be a result of hunger, anger, boredom, or many other things. He <br />noted a concern regarding the theory of rehabilitation, saying if a <br />person had put in his time in prison, went from maximum security to <br />honor security, then that person had paid his dues and should be able <br />to return to society free and equal. He noted the use of criminal <br />records to deny a person the right to choose employment after having <br />paid his dues to society equalled a "fly in the ointment." He <br />noted the Minorities Commission felt that inherent in using the <br />arrest record was race discrimination, that more blacks are arrested <br />and convicted than whites, and that it could possibly be a violation <br />of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />March 14, 1977--Page 7 <br /> <br />~03 <br />