Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,-- <br /> <br />Com 3/23/77 VI. <br />Pub Hrg <br /> <br />Com 3/23/77 VII. <br />Affirm <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to schedule <br />a public hearing for April 11. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Proposed Code Provisions for Public Improvement Procedures-- <br />Memo and ordinance were distributed March 17, 1977. In addition, <br />some corrections have been distributed to Council members "today". <br />Though it is desired that a public hearing be scheduled for March <br />28 on the matter, the ordinance would not be submitted for passage <br />until the April 11 Council meeting, after the new Charter goes <br />into effec t. <br /> <br />Shirley Swenson, Finance Research Analyst, summarized the changes <br />to be made to the original ordinance draft. <br /> <br />It was the original practice that, if a sidewalk or culvert abut- <br />ting a property was to be repaired or reconstructed, a notice was <br />posted with the property owner. It is now proposed that a notice <br />be sent to the owner of the property by first class mail at the <br />owner's address as indicated on the County Assessor's records. <br /> <br />Sections 7.156 and 7.157 would be amended to provide that if the <br />sidewalk construction is part of a larger improvement project, <br />notice shall be sent in accordance with the public improvement <br />ordinance. Also, on sidewalk construction required by Council, the <br />owner shall have 20 days from date of notice to obtain a permit and <br />20 additional days to complete construction. <br /> <br />In the public improvement ordinance, the term "standard street" was <br />changed to "maximum assessable width". Also, in the table on page _ <br />five, to make a provision for mixed use and historic use, a category <br />entitled "other" was added, with a factor given of 1.0--10.0 (accord- <br />ing to the most intensive use of the parcel and to the zone listed, <br />in which that use is allowed, which has the lowest factor). On <br />page eight, a housekeeping change provides that the City Engineer <br />should be notified, rather than the Department of Finance. <br />In Sub-section 3, wording was substituted to state that notice <br />shall be sent by certified mail. On page 11, the last sentence was <br />amended to say when the deferral ends the property owner may pay <br />the assessment in full, or may in 20 or fewer semiannual install- <br />ments pay the assessment and interest thereon at the rate then <br />authorized by ORS 223.250 from the date the deferral ends until the <br />assessment is paid in full. On page 12, the sub-section was amended <br />to say that a subdivision or resubdivision, either by a subdivision <br />or major or minor partition, is filed by the owner of the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to schedule <br />a public hearing for March 28. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Consideration of Anti-Fluoridation Petition for Referendum-- <br />Petition, Finance Department memo, and memo from City Manager <br />were distributed to Council. Manager related that the County <br />could hold a special election May 24. which would cost the City <br />about $10,000. Mr. Hoehne, County Elections Department, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~70 <br /> <br />3/28/77 - 20 <br />