Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit D <br />Findings <br />Single Family Land Use Code Amendments <br />Secondary Dwellings, Accessory Buildings and Alley Access Lots <br />(City File CA 13-3) <br />Land Use Code Amendments (CA 13-3) <br />Eugene Code Section 9.8065 requires that the following approval criteria (in bold italics) be applied to <br />a code amendment: <br />(1) The amendment is consistent with applicable statewide planning goals adopted by the Land <br />Conservation and Development Commission. <br />Goal 1 - Citizen Involvement. To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity <br />for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. <br />The City has acknowledged provisions for citizen involvement which insure the opportunity for <br />citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process and set out requirements for such <br />involvement. The amendments do not amend the citizen involvement program. The process for <br />adopting these amendments complied with Goal 1 because it is consistent with the citizen <br />involvement provisions. <br />The early concepts for these amendments emerged out of the city's Infill Compatibility Standards <br />(ICS) project (beginning in 2007), which was led by a task team that included 14 neighborhood <br />association representatives, a Housing Policy Board representative, and five additional members with <br />the perspectives of builders, developers, and designers of market -rate and affordable infill housing. <br />The initial code concepts were largely influenced by the previous work of the ICS project, specifically <br />the Single -Family Dwelling Subcommittee and R-1 Infill/Flag Lot Implementation Team (RIFLIT), as <br />well as the Neighborhood Livability Working Group, best practices from other cities, and a review of <br />Eugene land use code. Once drafted, the code concepts were reviewed and vetted by an external <br />advisory group comprised of neighborhood advocates, designers and builders with expertise in single <br />family housing, and two Planning Commissioners. The majority of the members of the advisory group <br />were also part of the original ICS/RIFLT team. <br />Prior to the start of the formal adoption process, the code concepts were sent out for broad public <br />feedback to over 120 individuals that are interested in the topic or involved in a group or profession <br />associated with neighborhood livability and infill, including neighborhood leaders and advocates, <br />property owners, architects, designers and developers, Infill Compatibility Standards Task Team, and <br />the Home Builder's Association. Other engagement and information opportunities included an open <br />house in June 2013, highlighting the project in the May edition of the Envision Eugene e -newsletter, <br />an open invitation to neighborhood leaders and other interested parties to meet about the <br />amendments, and the establishment of a project web page. <br />Findings - 1 <br />