Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Pete Peterson, 92 West 19th Avenue, spoke as a member of the Lane <br />County Historic Society. He noted the group was in favor of di- <br />versity for allocation of funds, but the problem existed that if <br />the ordinance were passed tonight, the funds would be permanently <br />departmentalized and perhaps the open system of funding would be <br />lost. He felt no one organization should have dominance over any <br />others and noted that last year seven homes were revitalized with <br />the $30,000 allocation, adding to the culture of the community. <br />He urged Council to consider the need for diversity in allocating <br />the funds. <br /> <br />Arnie Martin, 817 Lariat Drive, spoke as a representative of the <br />Eugene Wind Ensemble. He said the group consisted of a 50-piece <br />music organization and would like to go on record its appreciation <br />for being considered for some 1977-78 funds within the 25 percent <br />cultural application. <br /> <br />Spencer W. Alpert, 2450 South Louis Lane, spoke as a part owner <br />of property which had been revitalized through the Historic Review <br />Board1s allocation funds. He gave a brief review of how the re- <br />structured property had been accomplished for preservation and <br />added cultural impact to the community, noting that he felt these <br />funds were necessary for the future benefit of Eugene. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented. <br /> <br />Manager noted that only the resolution specified the long-range <br />goals and made the 50 percent, 25 percent, and 25 percent allocation <br />for room tax funds. He noted the two ordinances included: 1) the <br />original ordinance; and 2) an alternate ordinance which would continue <br />the present subcommitte until July 1, noting the differences of <br />opinion within the Council with regard to the appointment procedure <br />for the committee. Perhaps the alternate ordinance could be passed <br />this evening to continue the work that was being done by the Room Tax <br />Subcommittee, and in the meantime, Council could get some consensus of <br />opinion for its appointment procedure. He noted the tight time <br />schedule involved in regard to figuring the budget for 1977-78 and the <br />problem of making interim allocations. He said by the middle of May, <br />the Budget Committee should be done with its work and the Subcommittee <br />would have to have its interim allocations and projected allocations <br />done by that time. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieuallen asked how much money the allocations generally <br />generated. Mr. Mitchell, Finance Department, estimated there <br />would be $180,000 for this year. Manager noted that some funds <br />had not been allocated for the 1976-77 year and, therefore, there <br />was a balance of approximately $265,000. Mr. Lieuallen asked if <br />the Subcommittee had made firm committments to any group or ex- <br />cluded any group, to which Mayor Keller answered no, that several <br />had been interviewed but none had been excluded. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie questioned the Historic Review Board1s legitimate point <br />of trying to resolve whether they are indeed cultural or tourism <br />and what category they should fit into. Stan Long, City Attorney, <br /> <br />4/25/77--15 <br /> <br />~l <br />