Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />t <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />B. Paving 17th Avenue from 350 feet east of Quaker Street to ~ <br />600 feet east of Quaker Street; assessable property 62.8 <br />percent of total front footage; no city costs. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to accept and <br />approve petitions. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Com 5/25/77 III. Withdrawal of annexed ~r~~s from Oakway Water District: Cone/ <br />Pub Hrg ~reeden, Be,l!.line and Crescent; Smith and Gilham Road--Resolu- <br />tions distributed to Council. Mr. Bradley questioned what the <br />effect of action would be if after public hearing the City <br />Council decided to not allow the withdrawal? Stan Long, City <br />Attorney's office replied the residents of the area would then <br />be subject both to taxes on bond obligations in that district <br />and to the city. He said it was a complicated matter, and he <br />was not sure but that the city residents could force the City <br />to allow the withdrawal. Mr. Bradley then questioned on the <br />Cone/Breeden whether this was the appropriate time to approve <br />the withdrawal. Manager replied the City was following well <br />established policy procedures of the Council, noting that the <br />withdrawal from such water districts normally went through as <br />quickly as possible. Mr. Bradley then asked if it made any <br />difference that this property was undeveloped as to the tim- <br />ing of the withdrawal from the water district. Assistant <br />Manager replied that normally the withdrawal and annexations <br />occurred at the same time. He said that by allowing the with- ~. <br />drawal it would avoid a liability to the property owners for .., <br />paying on new bonds and being taxed by the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel to schedule <br />public hearing June 27, 1977, for withdrawal of <br />annexed areas from Oakway Water District. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Com 5/25/77 IV. Airline leases with United Airlines and Huzhes Airwest--Memo <br />Approve distributed to Council. Manager noted that-it was with great <br />pleasure the announcement could be made regarding the completion <br />of negotiations of new operating agreements with both United <br />Airlines and Hughes Airwest for the use of facilities at Mahlon <br />Sweet Field. These new operating agreements have been ratified <br />by both air carriers and cover the period from March 1, 1976 <br />through June 30, 1985. He said the negotiations had been going <br />on for a considerable period of time, many participants had been <br />involved, and he was pleased to announce that the airli~es had <br />consented to sign the term leases three years earlier than had <br />been necessary. <br /> <br />Bob Shelby, Airport Manager, reported that in 1973 the City <br />Council had authorized the Airport to start collecting a $2 <br />boarding fee which in part would be used to finance capital <br />improvements. He said, however, such capital improvements .' .. <br />funded by such fees had been disallowed by Congress. Discus- . <br />sions began with air carriers as to improvement assistance <br /> <br /> <br />1.\31 <br />6/13/77 -- 18 <br />