Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> , <br /> . Council Bill 14~5--Vacating easement located east of Norkenzie Road <br /> and the terminus of curtis Avenue north of Brewer Avenue was read <br /> by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member <br /> present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel that the bill be read the <br /> second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent <br /> of the Council, ana that enactment be considered at this time. <br /> Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time <br /> by council bill number only. <br /> Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel that the bill be approved <br /> and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Council members <br /> present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered <br /> 17~~b. <br /> I-A-S E. Rezonings <br /> l. Located the west side of Oak Street, between East l6th and Z7th <br /> avenues (~elisle) (Z 77-1) from R-1 to RG. <br /> Manager noted the zone change had been recommended by a 4:U vote by <br /> the Planning Commission at its April ll, 1<J77, meetng. He said the <br /> request was a change of zone from R-l Single-Family Residential to RG <br /> barden Apartment Residential district. Jim Saul, Planning Uepartment, <br /> said the property represents 6,7UO square feet and was presently occu- <br /> - pied by a single-family residence. The intent of the rezoning is to <br /> convert the single-family residence to a fourplex. He revi ewed for <br /> Council the surrounding property zonings and buildings. He said the <br /> Planning Commission had determined the request was consistent with <br /> the General Plan for a medium-density use in the area, and referred <br /> Council to staff notes and minutes from Planning Commission meeting. <br /> No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by <br /> Council members. Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of <br /> April ll, 1~77, were received as part of the record. <br /> Public hearing was opened. <br /> Erwin Belisle, l64U Oak, owner of the property distributed a picture <br /> to Council, indicating some idea of what the structure would look <br /> like. He said the improvement would not only coincide with other <br /> buildings in the area, but would improve the existing structure. He <br /> felt the residential area was deteriorating and would prObably go from <br /> residential to very poor residential. He said on the south and east <br /> there were already a number of apartments zoned Rb. He felt his re- <br /> quest met the l~~u beneral plan criteria and also a public need, <br /> citing the growing area ana need for more apartments. He felt since <br /> his request lIIet all the criteria it should be considered and approved <br /> by Council. He did not intend to make anything out of the ordinary <br /> by restructuring the existing structure. He had a list of property <br /> owners who were in Javor of the improvement. He asked Council if <br /> e they found any abnormalities in his request if they would please point <br /> them out. He noted there had been some changes in the area which had <br /> not gone through the proper procedures, as he was attempting to do. <br /> b/13/77 - 3 <br /> '+2.'l. <br />