06/13/1977 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, e for though they are specifically listed in the Code, they are not limitea to particular types of uses or normal options open to a developer. Mr. Lieuallen then asked how many units could be built by Mr. Belisle, to which Mr. Saul replied four. Mr. Ooie said he felt uncomfortable about the rezoning regaraing the adjacent property, i.e., residential area. He would not like to be a participant in a move that might be destructive to the residential area. Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to postpone the action on the rezoni ng until City Council had an opportunity to tour and view the site and make a decision on that basis. Mr. Bradley noted the Planning Commission had in the past studied the South Willamette area and thought it woula be prudent to tour the area and ask for additional information from the Planning Commission as to what had been studied in the past and any future projections for the area, especially regarding the traffic patterns. Mayor Keller replied he was not sure it was fair to ask Planning Commission staff to make recommendations about aecisions which should be made by the City Council. Mr. Bradley replied he was requesting advice from the Planning Commission to City Council. Vote was taken on the amendment to the motion which failed with e Williams, Smith, Hamel, and Delay voting no; Ubie, Haws, Bradley, and Lieuallen voting aye; and Mayor Keller voting no to break the tie. Mr. Braaley then moved to amend the motion to read lithe subject prop- erty be rezoned to R-2. II Mr. Bradley explained the reason for his amendment. It would be consistent with the plan of medium density for the area. It would still leave the applicant additional time to ask for rezoning to Rb, yet he would still be getting an economic return. It wou 1 d a 11 ow slower evolution of the area and give City Council time for review and tour. Amendment to the motion died for lack of second. Vote was taken on the main motion which passed with Council members Obie, Williams, Haws, Hamel, Smith, and Delay voting aye; Bradley and Lieuallen voting no. Lacking unanimous consent, the bill will be held for second reading June 27, 1Y77. I-A-6 2. Located east of Augusta Street and west of Laurel Hill Drive (Eugene planning Commission) (Z 77-1~) from County AbT and RA to C ity RA Manager noted this change had been recommended by Planning Commission e May 3, 1~77, with a 4:1 vote. Jim Saul, Planning Department, noted the property consisted of approximately ~o.tl acres. He said the abutting property included vacant property in the county to the east and south, the Laurel Hill elementary school to the northwest, ana the 6/13/77 - ~ 4-2.4