Laserfiche WebLink
<br />been done to correct the situation. He stated that the name of the street should e <br />be changed to Hawkins Heights Freeway. <br />Mr. Teitzel responded to the complaints by stating that the bike lanes conform <br />to the ,Bicycle Master Plan of the City and ~hat for a street such as this, two <br />bike lanes are required because the bicyclists are required to adhere to the rules <br />of the Toad just as an automobile, and if lanes are put in on only one side of <br />the street it encourages the bicyclist to ride on the wrong side of the road. He <br />further responded in regard to water in the gutter that there are springs on the <br />hill and it was felt that the expense of a storm sewer was not warranted. He <br />stated that after the construction a storm sewer was put up part way because water <br />was jumping over a driveway apron where a house was built below the road and the only <br />way this could be taken care of was with a storm sewer to catch the water before it <br />reached the driveway. He stated that a few years ago the lip was removed from driveway <br />standards because of the frequency of accidents with bicyclists running over the lip <br />at an angle. <br />Mr. Teitzel stated that in regard to Mr. Widmer's property that a permit was <br />required at the time the house was built to establish the grades of the future <br />street. Mr. Teitzel stated that the builder of Mr. Widmer's house, although required <br />to take out the permit never called for grades so the driveway was put in without <br />benefit of knowing where the street was going to be built. He stated that with <br />regard to the destroyed landscaping that this was done in the right of way. He <br />further stated he would check on the exposed water lines to see if this was the <br />contractor's responsibility. <br />Mr. Lieuallen inquired about the problem of the driveway which was replaced due to e <br />improper grade. Mr. Lieuallen asked Mr. Teitzel what had happened in this matter. <br />Mr. Teitzel stated that at the time the building permit was applied for it was <br />indicated on the building permit that a grade permit should be taken out so that <br />the City could go out and stake grades to indicate where the curb or sidewalk was <br />going to be, and in regard to Mr. Widmer's property the grades apparently were <br />never called for. Mr. Widmer stated that if the contractor had put the driveway <br />in to the grade of the street as now constructed, he would have been 6 1/2 to <br />7 feet below the street level. He stated that the driveway put in by the contractor <br />was level with Hawkins Heights but that the street was dug down 6 1/2 to 7 feet <br />lower. Mr. Teitzel stated that he did not feel that the actual roadway was lowered <br />that far but that at the edge by the bank it might have been lowered that far. <br />Mr. Teitzel stated that the City's policy is that if a contractor puts a driveway <br />in to the City's established grades and the City has to remove it for an improvement <br />then the city assumes the cost of the new driveway. Mr. Haws stated that he did <br />not see how the City could be responsible for what the developers do before the <br />City puts in a street. <br />R,ecommendation: Levy assessments as proposed. <br />B. C.B. l496--Levying assessments for paving and sidewalk on lvillamette Street <br /> from 40th Avenue to 600 feet south of the south end of Coachman <br /> Drive (76-10--382) <br />Requeststo be heard were received from John A. and Norene E. Miller of . <br />21 East 47th Avenue, Joy S. Goolsby of 18 East 47th Avenue and Donald F. <br />and La A. Ford of 10 Coachman Drive; written protests were received from <br />Chulsoon & Yee Yu Khang of 30 Coachman Drive and Mr. and Mrs. David D. <br />Rowe of 4150 Oak Street. <br /> 501 6/20/77 - Page 2 <br />