Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> IV. Overview of 1977 Legislative Action <br /> Paget Engen, Legislative Liaison, noted there would be a detailed report <br /> e out in about a month on action taken at the Legislature. She said <br /> said the most important thing was that the Legislature did not mandate <br /> any new major expense functions for city governments. <br /> She mentioned State Revenue Sharing, explaining that cities will get <br /> 14 percent of liquor revenues over the 20 percent they are now getting. <br /> On field burning, Ms. Engen noted that acreage burning limitations <br /> were raised from 95,000 to 195,000 acres this year and from 50,000 to <br /> 180,000 acres in 1978. She also said the responsibility for administra- <br /> tion has moved to the Environmental Quality Commission for policy and <br /> the Department of Environmental Quality for administration. In regard <br /> to Eugene's position on field burning, Assistant City Manager noted that <br /> staff has been looking at the City's options. The City Attorney's <br /> Office has advised that there may be legal options available. Staff is <br /> currently operating under policy set by Council which mandates that all <br /> efforts are made to reduce the effect of field burning upon the Eugene- <br /> Springfield area. Mr. Keller felt that staff should pursue, according to <br /> City policy, and keep Council updated. City Attorney Stan Long noted <br /> that much work needs to be done to determine if a legal course can be <br /> followed. At this point, he said, it looks as though the matter should <br /> be investigated. <br /> Mr. Delay felt the City must continue according to present policy. Mr. <br /> Long noted there is enough involved to do at least another month's work <br /> and come back to Council with a report on the legality of the field <br /> e burning legislation and what the City's options are in that regard. Ms. <br /> Smith thought it wise that the City Attorney's Office pursue those <br /> options and, after the report comes back, Council can then make a <br /> decision on whether to "go" or "no go". Mr. Obie was concerned about <br /> costs involved, feeling any decision to proceed should await more <br /> details on cost. <br /> Ms. Engen mentioned changes to LCDC, noting that local representation <br /> has been added to the LCDC Board. Goals and guidelines were redefined, <br /> a two-year moratorium on setting up new goals was set, and power was <br /> removed from LCDC to take over local planning. Boundary commissions were <br /> funded for another year, but Ms. Engen felt that the death knell was <br /> sounded for boundary commissions in the future. On tort liability, Ms. <br /> Engen noted that legislation was passed which should ease problems of <br /> local governments. Regarding personnel changes, Ms. Engen noted that a <br /> Department of Workers Compensation was created and the makeup of the <br /> Board was changed to include an administrator appointed by the Governor. <br /> She said the Circuit Court was removed as a step in the appeals process. <br /> Legislation passed in the area of unemployment insurance would set a <br /> voluntary State trust fund pool. The cost of becoming involved would be <br /> based upon actual experience, rather than a percentage of payroll. <br /> e 7/13/77--4 <br /> 5105 <br />