Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Warren Neer, 1336 Taft Street, owner or property at 3970 Cross Street was <br /> concerned with Alternative 3 re: how the properties other than . <br /> those on Cross Street would be assessed. He was in favor of Alter- <br /> native 2, as there are 19 residences on Cross Street in a trans- <br /> itional period, and it would work a hardship on the property. <br /> He also noted people who are objecting to truck traffic in the <br /> area would not be contributing to getting the truck traffic off <br /> the street, whereas people on Cross Street would be paying a high <br /> price to eliminate that truck traffic. <br /> Robert Flaherty, 123 Alva Park Drive, said when he moved to the <br /> area, he had no idea of this plan, and was ready to make improve- <br /> ments on his property. He requested Council make a quick and <br /> expedient decision so that property owners would know whether <br /> they were going to have to relocate. <br /> Roger Mike Van, 2435 Lily Avenue, represented property owners <br /> from Waite Street and said they were in favor of either Alternative <br /> 2 or 3. <br /> Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony <br /> presented. <br /> Mr. Lieuallen said he had talked to some interested parties questioning <br /> whether it was necessary to put the arterial in its proposed location <br /> of either Alternative 2 or 3 when there is access from 1st Avenue. <br /> Ms. Decker replied 1st Avenue did not connect to Beltline, and the e <br /> purpose was to have industrial access to Beltline other than 11th <br /> Avenue or residential streets such as Royal and Bertelsen. <br /> Bert Teitzel, City Engineer, responded to Mr. Neer's question <br /> regarding assessments, noting assessments would be made according <br /> to City policy whereby only abutting property owners and those taking <br /> access would be assessed. On Cross Street, the property owners <br /> would be assessed for a normal industrial-type street, estimated <br /> at $40 per square foot. <br /> Mr. Haws wondered if the arterial could be located from Beltline <br /> to Bertelsen and not go into the interior. Ms. Decker replied <br /> the arterial would be developed in stages and the first development <br /> would be from Beltline to Bertelsen. However, she said, those <br /> north of the railroad tracks who wanted to go north could do so <br /> only through this arterial as proposed, or otherwise would have <br /> to go out to 11th. The proposed arterial was to avoid truck <br /> traffic use of Royal, Elmira, and Bertelsen. <br /> Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to approve the policies <br /> as set forth by staff, and direct staff to prepare a resolution <br /> to adopt Alternative 2. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> e <br /> 8/22/77--10 <br /> ~40 <br />