Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> _-B-2 B. Rezonings <br /> 1. Property located on northeast corner of Bailey Hill Road and <br /> Westleigh Street (Valley West Center) (Z 77-24) from RA to RP-SR <br /> Recommended unanimously by Planning Commission July 5, 1977. <br /> The request was for a change of zone from RA Suburban Resi- <br /> dential District to RP-SR Residential Professional District <br /> with Site Review Procedures. Jim Saul, Planning Department, <br /> said the property consisted of approximately 1.3 acres and <br /> had been annexed to the city in 1966. The rezoning request <br /> was for the purpose of building professional offices in the <br /> area. The Planning Commission had considered the amount of <br /> residential development in the area as extensive and future <br /> development was expected. The request was consistent with <br /> the General Plan; and a public need was shown. Jim Bernhard, <br /> Planning Commission, was available to answer questions. <br /> No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared <br /> by Council members. Staff Notes and minutes were entered <br /> as part of the record by reference thereto. <br /> Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. <br /> C.B. 1528--Rezoning from RA to RP-SR property located on northeast <br /> corner Bailey Hill Road and Westleigh Street was read <br /> by council bill number and title only, there being no <br /> Council member present requesting it be read in full. <br /> e Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that findings supporting <br /> the rezoning as set out in Planning Commission Staff Notes and <br /> m1 nutes of July 5, 1977 be adopted by ref~rence thereto; that <br /> the bi llbe read the second time by council bi 11 number only, <br /> with unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment be <br /> considered at this time. <br /> Mr. Haws questioned staff what would stop the applicants from <br /> asking for a commercial rezoning in the future. Mr. Saul <br /> replied nothing would prevent that request. However, he sai d <br /> had that request been submitted to the staff and Planning Com- <br /> mission, it would have been supported at this time. Mr. Haws <br /> asked if staff felt there was a need for C-1 zoning in the area. <br /> Mr. Saul replied a reasonable case could be made, noting the <br /> number of recent subdivisions immediately adjacent to the prop- <br /> erty, the retirement centers being developed in the area, and <br /> various PUD's. <br /> Mr. Lieua11en felt this kind of development was conducive to <br /> reducing vehicular traffic around town. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion as stated and carried unanimously, <br /> and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> e <br /> (,35 8/22/77--5 <br />