My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/12/1977 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1977
>
09/12/1977 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 11:49:38 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:24:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/12/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> I <br /> 0 <br /> Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that findings supporting <br /> the rezoning as set out in Planning Commission staff notes and . <br /> minutes of August 1, 1977, be adopted by reference thereto; that <br /> the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, <br /> with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be <br /> considered at.this time. <br /> C.B. 1537--Rezoning from R-1 to R-2 SR Tax Lots 9200 and 9300 <br /> located between 13th Avenue and 14th Avenue, west of <br /> Chambers Street was read by council bill number and <br /> title only, there being no Council member requesting <br /> it be read in full. <br /> Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that findings supporting <br /> the rezoning as set out in Planning Commission staff notes and <br /> minutes of August 1, 1977, be adopted by reference thereto; that <br /> the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, <br /> with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be <br /> considered at this time. <br /> Mr. Lieuallen wondered what the present zoning was to the west of <br /> this request. Mr. Saul replied the zoning west of Chambers Street <br /> was mainly R-1 to the Westmoreland student housing project. He <br /> said the only commercial existed at Garfield and 11th. Mr. Lieuallen <br /> then wondered if the General Plan did not suggest residential zoning <br /> be carried to Garfield. Mr. Saul said it included residential past <br /> Garfield in medium density. Mr. Lieuallen said he was inclined to <br /> agree with the Planning Department staff recommendation. He said the e <br /> Code requires that certain rationale be met to change the zoning. He <br /> said in a portion of this request he did not see that happening. He <br /> felt this was a convenient method of rezoning land that does not <br /> follow under certain use and would vote no on the motion. <br /> Mr. Obie agreed with Mr. Lieuallen, saying he had empathy for the <br /> request for RP zoning on Tax Lot 9400 as the structure already <br /> existed there. However, he was concerned for the R-2 zoning on <br /> the vacant pieces of property. He was also concerned with the <br /> traffic problem in that area. <br /> Mr. Delay wondered if the primary rationale for the R-2 zoning <br /> request was because the RP zoning was immediately adjacent, or if <br /> changing all of the R-1 to R-2 zoning was something the Planning <br /> Commission would be considering. He wondered if they were related <br /> to each other or independent judgements. Mr. Saul said the Planning <br /> Commission has in the past and will continue to face a difficult <br /> problem in this area. He noted the General Plan calls for medium <br /> density, yet the area is mostly developed in single family use. <br /> He said in this particular instance, and in the past, the Planning <br /> Commission has recommended R-2 zoning when property is vacant. <br /> Mr. Delay noted he would vote against the motion also as he was <br /> not satisfied with the R-2 zoning portion and was worried about <br /> the rationale of rezoning on the basis of existing conflicting <br /> uses. . <br /> 9/12/77--8 <br /> ~5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.