09/26/1977 Meeting (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Res. No. 2759--Forwarding to Boundary Commission recommendation for annexation of property located between 1-105 and e Willamette River, west of Country Club Road was read by number and title. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to adopt the resolution. Mr. Bradley asked for clarification as to whether this annexation complied with Goal No. 15 of the Statewide Goals. Mr. Saul responded the purpose of Goal 15 was to review the development on the property in compliance with the Goal. Mr. Bradley said he was under the impression that municipal annexations must comply with LCDC goals. He asked if there were a goal of LCDC that would apply to this annexa- tion, and if that were No. 15, whether it was necessary to adopt affirmative findings. Mr. Saul again explained that question would come when the specific PUD development was being reviewed to see if it complied with that goal. Mr. Bradley requested a clarification from the City Attorney. Mr. Long referred to the Peterson vs. Klamath Falls case which dealt with a situation where City-County had no boundary commission. He felt the Lane County Boundary Commission was under obligation to determine compliance with the goals. The purpose of this City is to recommend only. He said Mr. Bradley's question was under study by the Attorney's Office, but thought it was within a realm of reasonable activity to not make such findings when. only recommending for annexation. e Vote was taken on the motion, which carried with all Council members present voting aye except Mr. Bradley and Ms. Smith abstaining. C.B. 1545--Rezoning from County PR to City C-2 PO property located between 1-105 and Willamette River, west of Country Club Road, was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that findings supporting the rezoning as set out in Planning Commission Staff Notes and minutes of August 8, 1977, be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, except Ms. Smith and Mr. Bradley abstaining and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Council members present voting aye, except Ms. Smith and Mr. Bradley abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18054. e 9/26/77--14 '31