Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e in this instance, the Planning Commission recommended in January <br /> 1976 it undertake a study ,of this area and from that came the <br /> Blayney Report in July of 1976. One specific recommendation was to <br /> rezone to high-density residential use. The Planning Commission <br /> conducted hearings on the Blayney Report and as a result in September <br /> 1976 recommended to City Council a pOlicy statement on transportation <br /> corridors in the area. Regarding the rezoning, the Planning Commis- <br /> sion informed City Council of their intent to initiate this action, <br /> noting Council was aware in September of 1976 and no objections <br /> were voiced at that time by Council. Regarding the lack of an appli- <br /> cant's statement, he said that was the purpose of the extensive <br /> Staff Notes provided for Council, as the burden of proof was on the <br /> City to prove its case. <br /> Mr. Delay said if Mr. Williams were going to take the position <br /> of not changing the ground rules, then Council would have to scrap <br /> plans for updating the 1990 Plan, refinement plans, etc. He said <br /> the Council and City cannot progress into a changing world without <br /> making changes and people will inevitably resist some of those changes, <br /> noting that was a normal process. He said given the large area <br /> under consideration for this rezoning, he was surprised there had been <br /> so little opposition. <br /> Mr. Lieuallen said he felt the Council was obligated to try to bring <br /> the zoning into compliance with the General Plan.' He said it is <br /> the function of the Planning Commission to do that. He noted the <br /> e lengthy public hearings and public input on this zone change and felt <br /> it is a reasonable compromise, saying it would be impossible to find a <br /> proposal that would satisfy everyone. However, this proposal seems <br /> to satisfy the majority of the people in the area and he did not <br /> feel that there was that much opposition to it. He noted it seemed to <br /> be a very workable compromise. <br /> Ms. Smith expressed appreciation for Mr. Saul's background material, <br /> and asked if the new plan for revising the downtown would be suppor- <br /> tive of this rezoning. Mr. Saul replied that the Elbasani Report had <br /> been predicated on the rezoning and would be complementary to it. <br /> Ms. Smith wished there had been a better compromise worked out to the <br /> satisfaction of Wyatt's and expressed some concern about that, but <br /> noted she would be voting for the motion. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion, which carried with all Council <br /> members present voting aye except Williams and Obie voting no. <br /> Lacking unanimous consent, the council bill will be held for <br /> second reading October 10, 1977. <br /> A short recess was taken. <br /> e <br /> 9/26/77--9 <br /> 13~ <br />