My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/26/1977 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1977
>
10/26/1977 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 10:40:01 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:25:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/26/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> E. Update in Council Goals Discussion <br /> Manager said the schedule for November was: November 9, Police e <br /> Services; November 16, Economic Development; and November 23, <br /> Council Assistants. <br />II. Report and Request for Council Instruction on Presentation at Department <br /> of Transportation Hearing on Preliminary Six-Year Program <br /> Excerpts from Program and draft of Mayor's letter distributed. <br /> State Highway Commission notified the City on October 13 of a sched- <br /> uled hearing on the six-year program for October 27. Excerpts from <br /> the proposal were distributed to Council for information as to what <br /> is being proposed for Eugene, with Manager noting it was practically <br /> zero. He said there were two programs: An "A" program if the gas tax <br /> passes; and a "B" program if it does not. He said staff had conferred <br /> with L-COG and had looked at the T-2000 plan. He noted the omission of <br /> 6th and 7th streets which had high priority in years past, need rehabi- <br /> litation and reconstruction and are State responsibility; along with <br /> Highway 99 from Roosevelt, north. He said the City's desires could be <br /> expressed through a letter from the Mayor, to be presented at the hearing, <br /> and used in staff negotiations in Salem. He noted there was a request <br /> from people in Junction City for endorsement of their program. He felt <br /> the City of Eugene should not be in any position of competing with any <br /> particular group for state highway funds. <br /> Mr. Haws wondered if it were the process that needed to be changed. - <br /> Manager said in the Mayor's letter there is reference that an improved <br /> process of allocating funds should be looked at. Mr. Williams noted the <br /> seriousness of the situation, saying it was not just in Eugene, nor just <br /> 6th and 7th avenues. He said the State was doing almost nothing anywhere <br /> in the state in terms of highway construction, as they have few funds. <br /> The road systems are deteriorating and with that deterioration the <br /> potential for mass transit. He supported the Mayor's letter in expressing <br /> the deteriorating conditions in Eugene. <br /> Mr. Delay wondered if Eugene was really at a disadvantage, and was not <br /> clear how projects are planned and funded. Don Allen replied one of <br /> the purposes of the Mayor's letter was to provide an arena for staff to <br /> talk to State officials as to how priorities were set. He continued <br /> that City staff had been on the initiative and had good rapport with <br /> the State staff. He said both Highway 99 and 6th and 7th streets had <br /> been high as local community priorities. Staff feels Highway 99 is a <br /> state project, noting local capability of financing that project is not <br /> present. He noted neither of those projects appear in the proposed <br /> six-year program, and staff had assumed they were "a committed status" <br /> with the state. <br /> e <br /> 10/26/77--4 <br /> BOG} <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.