Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III. Park Land Development Process and Program--Materials distributed <br />tit Ed Smith, Parks Director, referred Council to the brochure sent out- <br /> lining the Parks Development and Acquisition program. He said the <br /> original serial levy request was $7.5 million, and indicated on a <br /> map the South Hills area which would be affected. He said the review <br /> for park land development and acquisition under the serial levy began <br /> in 1975; however, because of operational impacts that development <br /> would have on the budget at that time and to try to make the program <br /> acceptable to voters, the serial levy was reduced to $5 million. The <br /> original charge was to present a comprehensive program that covers all <br /> the needs of the city. He reviewed for Council the eventual outcome <br /> by showing the areas on the map, including the South Hills ridgeline <br /> ,and other areas. He reviewed the parks standards for Council, noting <br /> that in 1960 there were 15.2 acres per 1000 population; that had re- <br /> duced in 1977 to 9.28 acres per 1000 population. The staff had assumed <br /> 15 acres per 1000 a good standard. Besides proposing bond issues or <br /> serial levies to relieve this inequality, some other equalizers were <br /> suggested as a means of assisting standards in meeting other recre- <br /> ational demands: Locations of space, programs conducted on it, physical <br /> condition of the space, and relative accessibility for people who will <br /> use the facilities. <br /> Mr. Smith noted the Joint Parks Committee was activated and had met <br /> on Tuesday night; it will be evaluating future park needs, development, <br /> and acquisition in the future. He noted there was a great need in the <br /> city for special facilities, indicating tennis 'courts, swimming pools, <br />e and areas to serve handicapped and senior citizens. <br /> A table outlining a park and open space development program anticipated <br /> Mr. Smith noted the Joint Parks Committee was activated and had metrams <br /> on Tuesday night; it will be evaluating future park needs, development, <br /> and acquisition in the future. He noted there was a great need in the <br /> city for speci the budget would always be a consideration when pre- <br /> senting any development. Another problem cited was whether acquisition <br /> or development should be considered first. The assumption had been <br /> made under this program that it was best to acquire land while available; <br /> he felt that had been a good decision at that time. However, staff now <br /> feels it needs to look at the special needs in the community and the <br /> demand placed on the use of the Parks systems. He noted the recent <br /> time period during the gas shortage when every park and program was <br /> fu 11 . He said that trend had continued to the present time. <br /> Mr. Smith also reviewed development cost per acre for park land, saying <br /> it would cost $250,000 for a five-acre park. He said the City has <br /> never had that much to complete development. <br />e <br /> 10/26/77 --7 <br /> ~/~ <br />