11/28/1977 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. Smith wondered to what extent the Bethel School District would be involved in the site review process. Mr. Saul said when the e application is submitted, a copy of the plans would be forwarded to the school district so they would have the opportunity to comment. He reiterated the primary concern of traffic pattern. No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Council members. Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of October 4, 1977, were received as part of the record by reference thereto. Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. Council Bill 1573--Rezoning from RA-PD to R-1 SR property located along west side of Danebo Avenue, south of Royal Avenue, was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that findings supporting the rezoning as set out in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of October 4, 1977, be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Council members e present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18084. --------------- I-A-6 3. Property located southwest of corner of 5th Avenue West and Adams Street (Fogel strom) (Z 77-36) from R-3 to C-2 SR Recommended by Planning Commission October 4, 1977, with a 3-2 vote. Manager reviewed location of the property and the request for zone change. Mr. Saul said the area involved 13,456 square feet, and reviewed the surrounding development. The property immediately west is zoned C-2 and developed with a variety of uses: west is an office structure, immediately west of that is a single-family residence and west of that are commercial uses; immediately south the property is zoned C-2 and developed with a variety of commercial uses. At the southeast corner there is a small piece of C-2 zoned property with an office site. Further east of the site the property is zoned C-2 and developed with parking lot and Safeway store. North of the site is zoned R-3 and developed with older residences. He said if the requested zone change is approved, the applicant intends to expand and consolidate the existing house, office structure, and Xerox structure. In re- viewing the request, the Planning Commission was faced with the fact the zone change may not be consistent with the policy objec- tives of the City. He said the issue was set forth in the staff e reports and minutes. However, a majority of the Commission felt the change, with C-2 and site review attached, was justified. 11/28/77 - 5 815