My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 06/13/05 Mtg
>
Item 2A: Approval of Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:30:40 PM
Creation date
6/9/2005 11:36:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zachary Vishanoff, Patterson Street, alleged that the survey was part of"smart growth marketing." He <br />asked what the City budgeted for such marketing in a year. He said he had witnessed bias similar to what <br />had been described in the previous testimony. He cited an article in The Oregon Daily Emerald. He felt <br />that the Parks and Open Space Division staff had a pattern of interpreting data "the way they want" and <br />"taking liberties" with neighborhoods. He felt that neighborhood groups were often at odds with City <br />staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Vishanoff asserted that his neighborhood had been "stonewalled" by the alley project. He alleged that <br />he had heard a Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) employee state that money for the upkeep for <br />alleys was diverted to the Riverfront Research Park roads. <br /> <br />Mr. Vishanoff wished to add to his Budget Committee testimony by listing more endorsees of the <br />resolution in regard to the basketball arena, including student cooperatives, the ASUO president and <br />others. <br /> <br />Lisa Warnes, 5020 Nectar Way, submitted her testimony in writing. She announced that the East Fork <br />Amazon Headwater Preservation Society (EFAHPS), formerly known as Nectar-Dillard Forest, formed an <br />alliance with the SCCSPOS. They opposed the "McDougal" land swap for the following reasons: 1) Opposition to it was overwhelming; <br /> 2) It set a bad precedent to move the urban growth boundary (UGB) to accommodate developers; <br /> 3) The 197-acre site that the proposed 900+ homes and commercial complexes was located on prime <br /> Class 1 agricultural soil; <br /> 4) The schools were already over-crowded and under-funded; and <br /> 5) It would cause traffic problems to worsen. <br />While she acknowledged that growth would occur, she averred paving over prime agricultural and <br />forested land was bad planning, short-sighted, irresponsible, and motivated by profit. She asked the <br />council to consider that as more growth was encouraged, it should be done in a sustainable manner. She <br />underscored that the air quality of the Willamette Valley already fell below State and federal standards for <br />air quality as the valley did not ventilate well. She questioned whether the City was prepared to <br />accommodate new people and whether there would be jobs available for them. She wondered if staff was <br />researching "smart growth." In closing, Ms. Warnes said she thought the survey seemed to be designed <br />for a particular outcome, one not founded in the best interests of the citizens as a whole. <br /> <br />Kate Perle, 4740 Wendover Street, shared a copy of the telephone survey the City sponsored to gain <br />public input on the Santa Clara parks proposal. She related that the SCCSPOS was "astonished" at how <br />the survey seemed to be designed to sway the respondents' answers by telling only part of the story or <br />through "actual misinformation." Copies of the survey were provided to the council with suggested edits <br />to indicate where the committee thOught the survey "had gone wrong." She read some of the questions <br />aloud and commented on portions of those she thought were leading. <br /> <br />Steve Pethick, 987 Almaden Street, said he participated in the Chambers Node Revisited (CNR) project. <br />He expressed appreciation for the work of Senior Planner Allen Lowe and consultants to develop design <br />standards that sought to protect what he called a "wonderful working example of a compact pedestrian- <br />friendly neighborhood." He shared that his wife, Pamela, and he both enjoyed the neighborhood and <br />hoped that it would remain a safe and attractive place to raise their children. He related that they <br />volunteered to help contribute to the success of the CNR process and had joined the Chambers Area <br />Families for Healthy Neighborhoods (CAFHN) group. He conveyed his pride in the group's <br />accomplishments over the past months which included the formation of an organization that enlisted the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 9, 2005 Page 3 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.