My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 06/13/05 Mtg
>
Item 2A: Approval of Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:30:40 PM
Creation date
6/9/2005 11:36:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
wished to make clear that CAFHN was not asking the CNR project team or the City to agree with <br />everything the group had recommended. She related that CAFHN expected the process to produce a <br />proposed standard that would protect the character and stability of the neighborhood. She called what had <br />happened with the mass and height standard a "fundamental failure" to fully engage the public in meeting <br />one of the project's most important goals. She reiterated that the standard would allow for the <br />construction of 40-foot structures in a neighborhood where most dwellings were approximately 20- to 22- <br />feet high. She underscored the neighborhood's repeatedly expressed objections to this "incompatible <br />standard." She noted that staff indicated that no public support had been expressed for the consultant's <br />proposal. She related that the project director encouraged the group to give testimony at the Planning <br />Commission hearing on June 28. She opined that three-minute testimony was not a productive way to <br />genuinely involve the public. She asked the council to encourage the City Manager to find a way to have <br />the CNR project team re-engage representatives of area neighbors to spend a "few hours" to find a <br />suitable alternative proposal prior to the hearing before the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Adam Waist, 307 East 14th Avenue, president-elect of the Association of Students of the University of <br />Oregon (ASUO) and member of the Board of the West University Neighbors (WUN), wished to speak <br />about the City's plan for repaving alleys throughout the City of Eugene. He stated that as the first <br />neighborhood slated for these improvements, his neighborhood had the "privilege" of working with City <br />staff on this issue. He said while not all members of the WUN could agree on the merits of the project, all <br />of them were grateful for the City's level of involvement. He wished to thank Civil Engineer Steve Gallup <br />of the Public Works Department for his numerous presentations at meetings and his willingness to take <br />into consideration the desires of the neighborhood. He also thanked Councilor Kelly and Program <br />Specialist Steve Norris, who helped the WUN evolve into a forum for concerned neighbors. He conveyed <br />the neighborhood's gratitude for Mayor Piercy's attendance at a recent meeting. He expressed hope that <br />the work done by staff and the level of involvement the City had shown in the project with the <br />neighborhood association would serve as a model not only for City involvement in neighborhood <br />associations as a whole, but for City projects in the future. He underscored that this collaborative intent <br />on the part of the City had not gone unnoticed. <br /> <br />Debbie Jeffries, 3800 North Delta Highway, spoke in regard to the draft plan for Parks, Recreation, and <br />Open Spaces (PROS). She said she and a neighbor both had property listed for acquisition in the plan <br />though neither of them had participated in the process. She pointed out that the draft plan had cost the <br />City $200,000 and was slated to plan out to 2025. She asserted that development of the plan had not been <br />coordinated with other City departments and the plan had identified numerous sites outside of the UGB. <br />She wished to bring the plan to the attention of the council because it had been discussed in budget <br />hearings and the Public Works Rates Advisory Committee meetings. She alleged there were "serious <br />flaws" in the plan as it omitted over 2,850 acres, including 2,500 of the West Eugene Parkway and 300 <br />acres of golf courses, two of which were designated as Park and Open Space on the Metro Plan. She also <br />wished to call attention to 1,300 acres that were not included because of being part of the Goal 5 <br />inventory. She averred this comprised 25 percent of the current property within the City limits as parks <br />and open spaces. She did not believe the plan should not be used for any council decision unless it <br />included every piece of land. She alleged there was a lack of coordination between departments. She <br />averred the Parks and Open Space Division was making plans for acquisition outside the UGB at the same <br />time that PDD maintained that all development should occur within the UGB. She felt the draft appeared <br />to suggest expansion of the UGB. <br /> <br />Don McElroy, 120 West 30th Avenue, explained that he had owned a house in the West University <br />neighborhood for 20 years and that he looked forward to alley improvements. He related that he had read <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 9, 2005 Page 5 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.