Laserfiche WebLink
was important to take the time to do nodal development, or whatever nomenclature it fell under, correctly <br />and to fully involve the citizens. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor congratulated the Nectar Way/Dillard Road citizens and the SCCSPOS people for <br />forming an alliance. She felt they had much in common as they were both dedicated to doing what they <br />thought was right for their respective communities. She wanted to know who paid for the Santa Clara <br />parks survey. She thought it was "push polling" and that it was inappropriate. City Manager Taylor <br />responded that the City paid for the survey. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz also thanked everyone for coming to the Public Forum. She thanked the members of the <br />firefighters' union in particular for coming out and sharing information with the council. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly also thanked everyone for coming down to speak. He thanked Ms. Perle for bringing <br />copies of the Santa Clara parks survey for the council. He had been involved with a number of surveys <br />and thought it was not unusual to ask questions in the ways that the survey had sought to do. He said, <br />however, that this strategy was effective only if the statements made to the survey-respondent were <br />absolute fact. He questioned whether the statements in the survey would qualify as fact. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman conveyed her gratitude to those who testified. She understood that the council had not <br />approved the draft Parks and Open Space Comprehensive Plan, but had merely voted to accept it. <br /> <br />Regarding the CAFHN and CNR issues, Councilor Bettman felt the issues could be resolved by more <br />advance work with neighborhood representatives. She thought the CAFHN proposal was modest and was <br />in line with the standards for nodal development. She remarked that since staff's objective was to remove <br />obstacles to higher density projects in neighborhoods, would not additional regulation in terms of <br />standards be considered obstacles? She wondered how the City would be able to implement character <br />standards in the face of Ballot Measure 37. She noted she had requested a work session on mixed-use <br />development. <br /> <br />2. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br /> A. Approval of City Council Minutes April 11, 2005, Work Session <br /> April 11, 2005, City Council Meeting <br /> B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda <br /> C. Ratification of Intergovernmental Relations Committee Actions of March 17, March <br /> 24, March 31, April 7, April 14, 2005 <br /> D. Resolution 4834 Approving the Eugene-Springfield Five Year Consolidated Plan for <br /> Housing and Community Development for Submission to the Federal Department of <br /> Housing and Urban Development <br /> E. Approval of 2005-06 Funding Allocations for Federal Community Development <br /> Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships, and American Dream Downpayment <br /> Initiative Programs <br /> F. Adoption of Resolution 4835 Adopting the National Incident Management System <br /> (NIMS) as the Standard for Incident Management in the City of Eugene <br /> G. Approval of Minutes, Findings, and Recommendations from the Hearing Official <br /> and Adoption of Resolution 4833 Forming a Local Improvement District for Alley <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 9, 2005 Page 7 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />