My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 06/13/05 Mtg
>
Item 2A: Approval of Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:30:40 PM
Creation date
6/9/2005 11:36:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT F <br /> <br /> MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Work Session <br /> McNutt Room--City Hall <br /> <br /> May 11, 2005 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: George Poling, Jennifer Solomon, Betty Taylor, David Kelly, Gary Pap6, <br /> Bonny Bettman, Andrea Ortiz, Chris Pryor. <br /> <br />Mayor Kitty Piercy convened the work session of the Eugene City Council. <br /> <br />A. ACTION: <br /> Resolution 4834; A Resolution to Approve the Eugene-Springfield Five Year Consolidated <br /> Plan for Housing and Community Development for Submission to the Federal Department <br /> of Housing and Urban Development <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy explained that this was a continuation of a Consent Calendar item at the previous meeting, <br />held on May 9. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor noted that the motion was already on the table. He said Linda Dawson, Grants <br />Manager for the Planning and Development Department (PDD), was available to answer questions. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman thanked staff for refining the language. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Kelly, moved to delete references in the plan regarding the <br /> City of Eugene's funding of street, alley, and traffic signal improvements in eligible <br /> neighborhoods on Table 2B, in the text and in the stated objectives unless the infrastruc- <br /> ture improvements were located contiguous with a publicly subsidized low- or very low- <br /> income housing development. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman averred that money slated for the alleviation of poverty and homelessness would be spent on <br /> projects that were not a high priority because of generally permissive language in the Consolidated Plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kelly appreciated the fine tuning of the language that allowed infrastructure improvements in <br /> combination with a housing project. He pointed out that this plan was part of the Community Develop- <br /> ment Block Grant (CDBG) process. He said historically the majority of the money had been spent to help <br /> various social service agencies and requests always outweighed funding capacity. While he believed there <br /> was a need for traffic calming and signalization, he did not think CDBG money was the "appropriate pot." <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor disagreed. She thought that low-income people had a legitimate need for things aside from <br /> housing. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 11, 2005 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.