My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 06/13/05 Mtg
>
Item 2A: Approval of Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:30:40 PM
Creation date
6/9/2005 11:36:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Kelly said he hoped staff would speak to the Land Use Code and other laws and policies in the grant <br />application. He thought the code could be area specific in many ways and already was given the different <br />zones and overlay zones. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly asked for an analysis of design standards in light of Ballot Measure 37. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman related that she had looked at the EPA Web site and had found that there were no mixed-use <br />policies from the City of Eugene. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman suggested that staff look at the minutes and listen to the tape of this meeting and inculcate <br />what Mr. Yeiter had said into the intent of the application. She asserted that the thrust of the Planning and <br />Development Department at this point was to remove obstacles to mixed-use development from the code. <br />She felt nodal development created a dense center with lesser densities as one moved farther from the <br />center and that mixed-use meant the entire area of a space was open for mixed-use. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter explained that this was not the definition the City was using for the mixed-use center program, <br />but rather the definitions of nodal development were still being used. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 commented that the council had been hung up on two words: 'removing obstacles.' He thought <br />the council should look at how to improve the code to better align with growth management policies or <br />some other way of calling it. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor agreed that how things were said was very important. Mr. Yeiter added that the <br />objectives were the same. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor said he was anxious to work with the council to find the way to express its direction <br />in a positive voice rather than in a way that sounded like there was skepticism regarding the policies that <br />were already in place. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 remarked that he welcomed people who knew nothing about Eugene and were not prejudiced by <br />what was here so that ideas could come out that had not been thought of before. He did not think the <br />council and staff had all the ideas. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 1:21 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Dennis M. Taylor <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Ruth Atcherson) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 18, 2005 Page 10 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.