Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Lewis Merrick, member of the Minorities Commission, gave a descrip- <br />tive review of his earlier life in St. Louis, living under an apartheid <br />policy. He described how all blacks were forced to live in a fenced <br />compound area patrolled by white persons. The blacks were excluded <br />Qy law from interacting with whites, from participating in a suitable ~ <br />human existence. He said it was important that Council realize the ,., <br />apartheid policy was not a foreign issue, but a very personal one. He <br />challenged the Council now has a chance to respond to the issue and cited <br />the tragedy that the people who enforce the apartheid system in South <br />Africa do not look any different than the City Council. However, City <br />Council was in a position to take a stand and oppose such a system. He <br />felt this was not an irrelevant issue, but one in which Council should be <br />directly involved. He felt it important any action of complicity with <br />apartheid to be repudiated by Council saying "no" to apartheid in any <br />form, in any pl aceJ in any countr,}j at any time. <br /> <br />Marion Barnes, 2417 Friendly Street, spoke on behalf of the Clergy and <br />Laity Concerned. She said Council has not had adequate public information <br />on the issue. She noted Thursday, February 2, a South African visitor <br />would be in Eugene, and the City Council was invited to attend that <br />meeting being held in the HCC Conference Room at 3:00 p.m. The group asked <br />that the issue be carried over to a Monday night meeting for a public <br />hearing, so that the public could make its concerns known. She said other <br />cities, such as Denver, Chicago, and San Antonio, had passed such a reso- <br />lution. Many other large cities in the nation are considering passing <br />such a resolution. She felt it an appropriate issue for City Council to <br />address. <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley requested the issue be set over for a public hearing at the <br />next Monday night meeting. Mr. Delay was concurring second. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Williams expressed being uncomfortable with the pUblic hearing sugges- <br />tion. He doubted any of the Councilors would change their minds as a <br />result of such a hearing. He did not feel any of the Councilors supported <br />the behavior of the South African government or any apartheid society, but <br />also questioned whether this was an appropriate issue for City government. <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley said possibly the public input, could change opinions on the <br />Council, and noted there were many people in the community who were <br />interested in this issue. He felt the philosophical issue of this being <br />a human rights issue was important and Council had been challenged to <br />make a decision. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie requested clarification on procedures, saying the public had <br />its opportunity to give input to the Council today. It was his under- <br />standing to hold it over would mean just Council action, and a public <br />hearing requires a motion to that effect. Stan Long said the bylaws <br />provide upon the request of two City Councilors an item can be continued <br />to the next evening meeting for further discussion. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith agreed with some of the comments of Mr. Williams, also noting her <br />sympathy with the issue. However, she felt Council should address the real <br />concern of whether or not international issues were issues which should be <br />brought before Council. She requested Council discuss the allocation of <br />its priorities and the appropriateness of the amount of time spent on <br />certain issues. ' <br /> <br />2/1./78--8 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />~ <br />