Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel responded by stating that this project was initiated by the subdivider <br />who was the property owner at the time of subdivision. Mr.oTeitzel further <br />stated that a subdivider must also be the owner of the land and at anytime the <br />property is sold, then the responsibility for the improvements becomes the new <br />owner's. He stated the City has no means to assess the developer if he does not <br />own the property at the time of the assessment. He further stated that the <br />owner who was notified of the original public hearing for award of bids on this <br />project was the original developer. Mr. Teitzel stated that at the first hearing <br />the award was delayed in order to notify Twin Buttes Design and Construction <br />and the contract was awarded after Twin Buttes was notified. <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel stated that State regulations do require a bond or satisfaction <br />that improvements will be put in or that potential property owner's he notified <br />of potential costs. The City does not take part in this process, except to <br />notify the State on request of what the improvement status is. <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel further stated that assessments are levied based on Chapter 7, <br />wherein the property owner is notified and the owner of the property at the time <br />of the assessment receives the billing. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay questioned Mr. Teitzel as to whether someone purchasing property has <br />a way to avoid being unaware of potential assessments. Mr. Teitzel responded <br />that an "Intent to levy an Assessment" is filed with all title companies at the <br />time a contract is awarded. He further stated that there is a period between <br />the petitioning for improvements and the "Intent to levy an Assessment" with no <br />formal or legal notice of proposed improvements, however, notification of pending <br />liens against property is considered a civil matter between the buyer and seller <br />of the property. <br /> <br />Recommendation: levy assessments as proposed. <br /> <br />D. C.B. l596--levyingassessments for paving and storm sewer on Chase Street from <br />Royal Avenue to Bell Avenue (1365--77~41) <br /> <br />No written protests or requests to be heard were received. <br /> <br />Recommendation: levy assessment as proposed. <br /> <br />E. C.B. 1597--Levying assessments for 1/2~ levy on Various Planned Unit Developments <br />(76-1008) <br /> <br />Assessment postponed until further scheduled, due to difficulty in <br />notifying property owners. <br /> <br />'01 <br /> <br />(\ <br /> <br />2-6-78 - Page 2 of 2 <br />