My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/13/1978 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1978
>
02/13/1978 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:37:45 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:27:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/13/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sherry Oeser, 560 Tyler, noted many other cities in the country <br />who had passed such resolutions for boycotting. Included in those <br />were the American Federation of Government Employees, the Inter- <br />national Personnel Management Association, and the Oregon Chapter <br />of the American Institute of Planners. She supported the boycott <br />and hoped City Council would do so also. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Margie Hendriksen, 1245 Tyler, Oregon Women's Political Caucus, <br />spoke as a women and as a taxpayer of the City. She did not want <br />the City of Eugene spending her tax money in states where she was <br />not recognized as a full citizen. She noted various inconsis- <br />tencies regarding the adoption of the ERA, in which the State of <br />Illinois had adopted the 3/5 requirement for adoption of this <br />amendment, but which would not apply to other amendments. She <br />noted, also, in Nevada and Florida, there were elected officials <br />who promised to support ERA, but after were elected, opposed it. <br />She felt it very appropriate for Eugene to take this stand, as <br />it is known to be a very progressive city and one concerned for <br />human rights. <br /> <br />Those opposing the suggested boycott were as follows: <br /> <br />Lorene Henry, 2620 Fillmore, requested Council consider the source <br />of the request, the Women's Commission. She said this commission <br />had been created to help women against discrimination, yet now <br />they were requesting use of discrimination. The proposed boycott <br />would economically affect poor women in states where the boycott <br />would take place. She felt this was the wrong use of politics. <br /> <br />Esther Deffenbacher, 4610 Old Dillard Road, felt Eugene should <br />not be involved in the use of force through a boycott and should <br />not be interfering with other people's jobs. She said evidently <br />the ERA amendment is lacking something as it is not strong enough <br />to win on its own merits. She pointed out the economic hardships <br />resulting in loss of jobs in hotels, motels, and restaurants if <br />the boycott were pursued. She noted it could boomerang against <br />the principles they are trying to eliminate. She felt the boycott <br />was a desperate move and the City Council should have no part in <br />it. She expressed her strong feelings for Eugene as a community, <br />and she wanted to continue to be proud of it. <br /> <br />Helen Taff, 25292 Perkins Road, Veneta, expressed her opposition, <br />and noted her attendance at a Women's Commission meeting where a <br />request was made that the Women's Commission disapprove the boycott <br />because of the damage it would cause the women's movement, as well <br />as the economic hardship to so many women. That request was re- <br />fused and she felt that was a real reflection of the ruthless <br />attitude of the many advocates of the ERA. She urged Council not <br />to support the economic boycott. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2/13/78--8 <br /> <br />~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.