Laserfiche WebLink
<br />there was a demonstrated need and the City should be able to come up <br />with the money by exploring every possibility. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller said he felt the Council had gone on record as being in ~ <br />favor of the improvement project, but the financing vehicle had been <br />eliminated. He said there is very little State money allocated to <br />Eugene. He recognized citizens of the City lived there and felt <br />Council and the City should be talking to the Department of Trans- <br />portation to take care of this State. problem. He felt there would <br />be very little support in the community to spend $1.7 million for <br />a small portion of the highway. Mr. Allen said the total figure to be <br />paid by the City would be $1.8 million with that figure increasing <br />weekly due to inflation costs. He also said Federal funding had been <br />sought and that was not available. <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley again said he felt the City had an obligation to the citi- <br />zens who lived there and should pursue the project. He noted at the <br />public hearing, the ABC were in support of the project. The only <br />adverse comments heard were from property owners because of assess- <br />ments that would accrue to them. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay said in going back to the root of the problem, it was a shock <br />to find that the State1s six-year plan had dropped the Highway 99 pro- <br />ject. He noted the City pays taxes and there seemed to be some problem <br />of the State facing up to its responsibilities. He felt it necessary <br />that Council and community keep continued pressure on the State to <br />face up to its responsibilities, as the City simply cannot pay for those <br />kinds of projects. He did not support the idea of local funds being <br />used, but did support the idea that pressure be mounted at the State <br />level, noting that there are real hazards and a need for improvement <br />in that area. Ms. Smith supported Mr. Delay.s remarks. <br /> <br />Mr. Allen said he wanted to make a correction for Council in that the <br />money that was allocated was a local determination left up to the <br />community through L-COG in a process of pub1ic hearing. The bond issue <br />funds were allocated from the state, and the City received only $290,000 <br />for this project. He said there are other sources of State funding <br />and the staff is making demands on the State for funding of this project. <br />However, the State could not be blamed for the little amount of money <br />allocated for this project, as it was a local determination. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Williams noted there was an opinion with the Highway Division that <br />Eugene had said it did not want any roads because of the Freeway Amendment. <br />He said one of the costs of that attitude is that the kind of problem <br />facing the Council today. City Manager noted staff and Mayor were making <br />some inroads to the Department of Transportation in that respect. The <br />six-year plan is in the process of revision with additional funding <br />hopefully coming to Eugene. Mayor Keller said he recognized the initial <br />six-year plan had ignored the demands of the City, and letters had been <br />written and discussions held with State officials, indicating Eugene feels <br />it should have some priority. He said that process would continue. <br /> <br />2/15(78--10 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />III <br />