Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />(Effected property on petition; assessable costs: paving, 100 percent; <br />sewers, 100 percent, City costs, $4,000 for storm sewer.) <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to adopt the resolution. <br />Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />VII. APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to approve the Council minutes <br />of February 15, 1978. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimouly. <br /> <br />VIII. CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY AT 2043 OHIO <br /> <br />Manager noted that the City is condemning this property as being dangerous. <br />The owner has requested a hearing on the matter, which is required under <br />the Code. <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to call a public hearing on <br />the matter for March 13. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />IX. L-COG BOARD MEETING ON CONSIDERATION OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPONENT OF <br />THE 1990 PLAN <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley mentioned that Thursday, February 23, the L-COG Board will <br />be meeting to consider adding a growth management component of the 1990 ~ <br />Plan. The City's representative to that board, Eric Haws, will be .., <br />attending and Mr. Bradley felt that he might want some direction from <br />Council. He noted that the matter involves what the City is doing in the <br />update process, noting that Council spoke about it at the joint meeting <br />held with Springfield. He said it appears that the request being made <br />to the L-COG Board is that they seek additional dollars from the State <br />to work with the staff of the 1990 Update Plan so that alternative growth <br />scenarios can be adopted for the metropolitan area and considered along <br />with the update. When the City made recommendations to the Metropolitan <br />Plan Policy Committee, one was that the Committee consider alternative <br />population projections. The request before L-COG is to ask for addi- <br />tional dollars from the State, and he wonders if Council should concur <br />with that. City Manager noted it is important to understand that the <br />discussion may refer to the growth rate management. Mr. Delay feels that <br />the proposal Mr. Bradley has outlined sounds as though it would be of <br />value. Mrs. Smith noted she has not seen it and would be uncomfortable <br />giving direction to Mr. Haws without seeing it first. Mr. Obie wondered <br />if Council could ask the L-COG Board to postpone the matter so that <br />Council might have a chance to look at it first. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />2/22/78 - 8 <br /> <br />I~ <br />