Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Vote was taken on the amendment to the motion, which failed with ~ <br />Obie and Smith voting aye, all other Councilors voting no. .., <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the main motion, as amended, which passed with <br />Hamel, Bradley, Haws, Delay, and Lieuallen voting aye; Smith, <br />Obie, and Williams voting no. Lacking unanimous consent, the <br />council bill will be read the second time April 24. <br /> <br />C.B. 1649--Regarding special assessments for local improvements; amending <br />Section 7.180 of Code, 1971; and declaring an emergency was <br />read by council bill number and title only, there being <br />no Councilor present requesting it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that the bill be read <br />the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous <br />consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this <br />time. Motion carried with Hamel, Bradley, Haws, Delay, and <br />Lieuallen voting aye; Obie, Smith, and Williams voting no. Lacking <br />unanimous consent, the council bill will be read the second time <br />April 24. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie requested staff prepare a resolution asking Lane County and <br />Springfield to consider such a tax proposal. <br /> <br />A short recess was taken. <br /> <br />B. Rezonings <br /> <br />1. From R-1 to R-2 property located on east side of <br />Villard Street, north of 15th Avenue (Daugherty) (Z 77-43). <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Recommended unanimously by Planning Commission March 7, 1978. Jim <br />Saul, Planner, said the property contained 10,700 square feet and was <br />developed with a single-family residence. It is located in an area <br />characterized by a variety of uses. The original request was a zone <br />change from R-l to R-3 heard by the Planning Commission in December <br />and denied. That denial was appealed to the City Council for a <br />February 13 meeting; prior to that hearing, however, the attorney <br />representing the applicants indicated a wish to change the request <br />from R-3 to R-2. The Planning Commission considered the revised <br />request March 7, 1978, and approved unanimously. Findings of the <br />Planning staff and Commission were that the request was consistent <br />with the General Plan, there was a public need, and the need would be <br />best suited by rezoning. Mr. Saul noted the findings were before <br />Council in the material submitted. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />4/10/78--9 <br /> <br />~b <br />