Laserfiche WebLink
<br />nature of locations of employment are important to consider. It is <br />anticipated the downtown to continue to be a stronger attractor of ~ <br />employment trips. The model is responding to those things that have . <br />been plugged in. The main reason people might ride the bus is it is more <br />convenient, there would be no parking problem at the other end of the <br />trip, and transportation has become more expensive than housing. <br /> <br />Mr. Snowdon said the transit split was a given. The modeling done after <br />that reflected where people desire to go using their autos. TPC tried to <br />look at where the general ridership patterns are today, and proportionately <br />increase those until they reached 14-15 percent modal split for Eugene. <br />The downtown area is such a strong attraction in terms of jobs, and people <br />from the South Hills area are oriented to the white collar businesses <br />located in the downtown area. <br /> <br />Mr. Farah said the plan anticipates a goal of five-percent bike rider- <br />ship. Also, TPC is making a statement that bike ridership is very <br />important, and should be encouraged through suggestions from the Eugene <br />Bicycle Committee. It suggests that work be continued through the <br />Bicycle Committee as part of Metro Bikeway Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie wondered how, in the procedure, Council would come to grips with <br />the mass transit goal. Mr. Farah said the policy, as drafted, includes <br />wording for Lane County, Springfield, and Eugene. As the City Council <br />moves for action, it is acting only for the City of Eugene and suggested <br />wording that would embody a metro-wide plan. <br /> <br />James Bernhard, President, Planning Commission, reviewed for Council the <br />various policies and changes made by the Planning Commission. He called <br />to the Council's attention the importance of the land-use issues involved. <br />He said some were existing and should be reinforced; others are amended <br />and should be dealt with at the time of the update. However, it was felt <br />there should be a strong official commitment to the update process. <br />The Planning Commission recommended major review be done every five years, <br />with continued update yearly. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Farah noted the policies are an important part of the plan as those <br />policies would be used by Council in making decisions regarding transpor- <br />tation in the coming years. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie referred to the section on page 21, item I, A and B, regarding <br />major new commercial development in the downtown area. He wondered if <br />that policy might create more transportation problems than it solves. <br />Mr. Snowdon said it was felt this policy inclusion would be one of the <br />most effective ways of encouraging transit ridership. Potentially, if <br />transit ridership is not achieved, wi:th concentration of much of the <br />development in the downtown area, it is not effective to serve that type <br />of concentrated development by the automobile. Mr. Porter said that <br />particular item referred to by Mr. Obie should be read in context with <br />the one on page 22, numbered 4. He said those combined are encouraging <br />City goals directed toward the central area as it is felt to be the heart <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />5/10/78--8 <br /> <br />3&+1 <br />